| With the formation of environmental issues and with the development of environmental disputes increasing in recent years, the traditional litigation-dominated environment to deal with dispute settlement mechanism is faced with a tremendous challenge. In addition to seeking environmental lawsuit reform and finding the corresponding legal mechanisms, one must select the most favorable positive developments in the litigation system among the dispute settlement mechanisms. The legal system mechanism for handling disputes between China and Japan's delegates and many other countries have led to the establishment and the improvement of the legal mechanism for handling environmental disputes. After more than 10 years of development, China has formed a relatively complete legal system for the environment, yet however, the requirement for the judicial system for handling environmental disputes is far from perfect and is currently insufficient in legal practice and still cannot meet the needs of solving environmental disputes. In order to better address environmental disputes, and to maintain social stability in order to continuously improve the system of litigation; we must also learn from other foreign environment administrative legal mechanisms for handling disputes, to draw on their useful experiences and to gradually improve the Chinese administrative mechanisms for dealing with environmental disputes.In this paper, along with the introduction and conclusion, the legal concept of environmental dispute concept will be divided into four chapters.Chapter 1: defines the concept of the legal mechanisms related to dealing with environmental disputes. This first chapter will explore the definition of environmental disputes, will examine the scope of the environmental disputes followed by an analysis of the environmental disputes comparing and contrasting the differences of ordinary tort disputes. We will be examining the characteristics of the latest environmental dispute cases and will be synthesizing relevant data and analyzing the legal status of environmental disputes and the latest development in legal environmental trends.Chapter 2: This section will examine key environmental disputes and provide an analysis into the existence of a mechanism for determining justice. This chapter will first explore the management of environmental disputes dealt from the definition and from the perspective of legal theory, demonstrate the practice in dealing with environmental disputes. The chapter will also deal with the right to intervention in private land use. Finally, the chapter will conclude by highlighting advantages of a specific mechanism for dealing with environmental disputes and examining environmental sustainability.Chapter 3: introduce our mechanisms for dealing with environmental disputes and include an analysis of the status quo of the situation. This chapter will first explore the country's mechanisms for dealing with environmental disputes; recommend how changes can be made to the system and the relevant legislative provisions; secondly, demonstrate an analysis of the legal mechanisms of dealing with environmental disputes of existing dispute problems.Chapter 4: establish and improve China's environmental dispute settlement system. This chapter will first introduce Japan's, Korea's and China's Taiwan administration region on environmental disputes and their provisions of their mechanism for handling their legal definition of environmental dispute and secondly, comparing it to China's legal environmental stance on china's actual conditions, and revisiting china's policy on foreign administrative mechanism for handling such environmental disputes. At last, we will make recommendations of useful experiences, propose the establishment of environmental disputes and improve our administrative processing legal mechanism. |