| In modern democratic countries, the legislature is all kinds of conflict of interest and the main confrontation sites. In essence, the legislation is legislation in the multiple main conflict between the interests of the public by the choice of expressing their interests become the most important legislative issue. Legislation has a direct expression of the interests of expression and indirect expression of two ways, but in our country's legislative practice, we still have many problems and the fields of theory are lack of deep researches. This paper researches on the mechanism limitation of interest expression in our country's legislation and analyzes the cause by the emphasis of indirect expression. First, from the representativeness of the people's delegates, people's delegates are lack of representativeness and can not cover the different social status, resulting in some sectors, interest groups not represented in the legislature or on behalf of little direct impact on legislation in the interests of expression. Second, legislations are activities highly in process. So, legislation process is the material expression and main vehicle of interest expression. From the legislative process, it's profoundly manifested as two aspects, which are lack of expression of formal legislative process and excess of expression of informal legislative process. In the aspect of formal process, it's expressed that legal subjects can't lie proposed laws, and discussions and vote become simple agreement, not the process of effective expression. In the aspect of informal process, it's expressed as the problems such as legislative programming, drafting out laws and unitive discussions of the legal commission. Third, some problems such as obstructed channels; unsound systems exist in citizens' direct expression. Finally, the paper proposes the suggestions of how to perfect the mechanism of interest expression in our country's legislation from the three problems of reform of people's representatives system, perfect of legislative process and legislative hearing evidence. |