Analysis On The Structural Factor Of International System Transition

International system consists both of system structure and system units, the interaction effect among the structure factor of status quo, international regimes and system culture restricts international system transition, relative gains arouse cooperation deadlock and power displacement of potential challenger which urge structure change and then drive international system transition. Different international theories make a different commentary on system units, and the structure factor themselves are complicated in addition, so it is necessary for the structure factor to assume and predigest theory. The theoretical assumption about the structure factor is to take the first step in analyzing anarchy, and anarchy has the feature of. order cycle. Because international relation does't exist a world government to pledge the security of system actors, actors have no choice but to safeguard the security themselves and carry out power politics in foreign policy, then the international politics order appears the cycle course "order-orderless-order". system structure that is defined by matter and ideal is existed, in other words, system structure is defined by matter and soft act on matter and then supply with essential significance or value. Furthermore, the paper enters on interaction lever and system lever, assumes soft has constructed state identity and benefit. The paper predigests the structure factors of international system that comprehend main actor, actor bias and state positional effect. International system main actor is predigested nation and area community , don't analyze the effect of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Multinational Company (MNC). As nation and area community, their behavior preference is rational, and the choice of preference is on the base of civil politics and international politics . The principle of preference choice is related to state idea, that is to say, state identity and benefit is defined by idea; the state positional effect of international cooperation determines on state that focus their attention on relative gains or absolute gains, and then determine actor focus their attention on position of system themselves. International system status quo, international regimes and system culture all restrict international system transition. The dominant nation of system has a common goal to maintain stabile structure, if the power distribution isn't endangering the structural stabilization, the dominant state of system hold the positions of authority and hierarchy of prestige continually. Furthermore, the balance of power and free ride behavior both maintain international system. The foundation of International regimes restricts the behavior of system actor, provides decision-making Procedure, fulfills the transform desire of system actor. System culture restrict international system transition, because culture has conservative characteristic, more steady than matter structure. The act of chasing relative gains,the change of international system structure and the formation of common culture are all the impetus of international system transition. It is apparent to damage system that chasing relative gains. Because actors don't receive the disproportion distribution of interest, the spectrum of international cooperation is reduced mostly. Once the state is good for relative gains, pure and harmonious absolute gains relation of the two actors turn to the competition of zero-sum game. The act of chasing relative gains and abandoning absolute gains shakes the stabilization of international structure. International structure is always tend to stabilization, none but the positions of authority and hierarchy of prestige continually potential challenger are higher than the hegemonic state of system, and then arise international system transition. In the end, the paper analyses the restrict behavior of system hegemonic state after Cold War. The positions of authority and hierarchy of prestige of the system hegemonic state is the base of international system stabilization. When the decline of system hegemonic state, the cost of maintaining international regimes elevate along with. So system hegemonic state demand its allies who assume the corresponding cost. When allies or potential challenger acquire gains, it turns into main strength gradually to support international regimes. The rise of power establishes the positions of authority potential challenger and makes other states acknowledge its international regimes, and hegemonic state recede its position from the top power, then come into being the new international structure. The transition of international structure challenges Amercian dominative ability. When...