The Construction And Value About Sun Yat-sen's People's Livelihood

The livelihood occupies very important position in Sun Yat-sen's ideological system, it is a core of Sun Yat-sen's thought, it is Mr. Sun Yat-sen's objective of the struggle to realize the people's livelihood happily in his lifetime.Forming and development of the livelihood is a course of historical development. With the constant change of politics and economic situation of domestic and international society,and the constant improvement of Sun Yat-sen's recognition. The livelihood thought is being got constantly abundant and completely progress. This text has described the source, intension and the value of his livelihood together with the relation among the livelihood, socialism and the communism.According to the special national conditions of our country, the livelihood has absorbed the quintessence of China's traditional economic thought and drew lessons from the western capitalism and Soviet Union socialist experience for reference, It has proposed strategic policies to solve the people's problem of our country, develop modern economy of our country and promote the progress of the social civilization. The intension of the livelihood thought, from proposing " equalization of landownership " to " regulation of capital ", and then reach " industry's plan " of proposing, it is a more intact social economic system and scheme of the system reform, it is a grand blueprint of building independent, democratic, prosperous country. About the value of the livelihood thought, which is determined as the starting point and home of Sun Yat-sen's thought, It is mainly from the" basic theories ", " plans of national reconstruction " of Sun Yat-sen's thought and the visual angle of philosophy theory to discuss the value of the livelihood.The last part of the contents is a problem with greater dispute in the study of the livelihood. It varies from the Marx's scientific socialism and any of the western social theory .Sun Yat-sen has his own original opinions on the livelihood, and has his own understanding of the so-called "socialism ", "communism " too. Comparatively speaking, he is mainly sure of Marxism, he also regards his own theory as the new development of Marxism. This conclusion lets the dispute existed in the research of livelihood be further clear.