| "Er Ya Zheng Yi"(hereinafter referred to as "Zheng Yi") and "Er Ya Yi Shu"(hereinafter referred to as "Yi Shu") are important annotations of "Er Ya", so far we have only found the articles of comprehensive research into the achievements and deficiencies about the two books respectively, and the evaluations can be found, too.But we have not found any artcles or books of specific comparative research into the content of the two books.So the annotations in "Zheng Yi" and "Yi Shu" for "Er Ya Shi Gu Shang" are plan to be the object of this thesis, and through concrete analysis we strive to comprehend the two books in the differences,achievements and deficiency more intuitively the and specificly, and to make some contribution for the research of "Er Ya".This thesis has five main parts:Part 1:a simple introduction, which introduce the research object, the theory and method of this thesis, also includes the values of the research.Part 2:the comparative research into annotations of "Zheng Yi" and "Yi Shu".This part is divided into five parts again, which analyses the authors and books, annotation style, the content and regulation of revise, the exegectical terminology and function of'sound and meaning integrating together'.on the whole, we use the method of comparative analysis and statistical analysis of data.When we analyse the content in the two books that use the theory of'sound and regulation of revise'to conjoin paronyms,we use the determinant standard of paronyms fixed by Wang Li in "Tong Yuan Zi Dian"and we use the principle of the same or similar pronunciation fixed by Wang Li in "Tong Yuan Zi Lun".We strive to inductive similarities and differences of the two books on the basis of the analysis for specific language materials.Part 3:conclusion.This part makes a conclusion as a whole, on the one hand, we affirm the status of Shao Jin Han and Hao Yi Xing in the exegetics history, and the of exegetics value of the two books.On the other hand, we also point their shortcomings and errors in the two books.According to thesis, we try to make a conclusion impersonal and impartial to take the essence, discard the dregs. |
