A Comparative Study Of Heidegger's And Marx's Existential-Ontology

The thought of Heidegger's existential-Ontology is profound, but finally fell into the deep end because of its insurmountable difficult in theory which oneself is unable to solve. Although Marx is earlier than Heidegger and not to propose the concept of existential-Ontology explicitly, but its thought contains the rich content of existential-Ontology actually already has the acknowledgement in academia, and surely the Marx's existential-Ontology which has newly construction is the outlet of the Heidegger's existential-Ontology.This essay based on the existent comprehension of Heidegger's and Marx's philosophical document, separately elaborated the thought of Heidegger's and Marx's existential-Ontology.In the first part, the author start with limits the conception of exist and existential-Ontology and emphasize on the conception of being, existence, there-being, being-in-the-world, misery, anxiety, thought, enframe, etc. to expatiate the Heidegger's existential-Ontology theory in prophase and anaphase, intends to indicated the Heidegger's indeed has the obvious transition on the research object in prophase and anaphase, but in his thinking method as well as the research purpose are consistent.In the second part, the author start with the conception of being and exist, and along with the thread of labor, alienation labor, and communism to clarify the essence of Marx's existential-Ontology: practicality, historicity, and sociality.In the third part, the author focuses on the logical originating point and philosophy foundation of Heidegger's and Marx's existential-Ontology, intends to clarify the three difficult in Heidegger's existential-Ontology, namely, the difficulty of value appraisal do not be applicable general, the difficulty of being can not strike to existence, and the difficulty amongst various existence can not strike. Only alone practice in Marx's existential-Ontology can be make the position of the outlet of the theory difficulty.