| After the world war II, the responsibility for the war and the understanding of history has always been a major obstacle of Sino-Japanese relations, and this also influence Japan's relations with Asian countries. Japanese politicians has made a series of evil actions on the issue of war responsibility and the understanding of history, Cabinet members frequently visited to the Yasukuni Shrine, Ministry of Education has permitted distortive history textbooks repeatedly issued, the war views of "Great East Asian War ", "self-existence and self-defense" and "liberating Asia" so distorted the facts remarks were released……These acts with the Japanese authorities reacted after the defeat was a sharp contrast. Japan's postwar political war views has gone further in the right trend, Japanese authorities with the conservative political trend has close ties. From "100 million total remorse" to the increasingly tough concept of the "Great East Asia War", what kind of changes has happened and what kind of reasons contributed to the changes that are thought worthy for the Asian countries including China to think over. We should integrate with the international background of the war-depth, to analyse the evolution of Japanese politicial circles'war views, and this can make a reasonable interpretation. The evolution of the post-war Japanese government war views, as the frequent replacement of the prime minister appears either to have ups and downs. masqueraded as a capricious process of change. But the international background, with the conservative and right-wing forces in Japan's political influence gradually increase. Japanese rightist politicians and reactionary view of the war also plays a corresponding degree of change Japan's postwar political war views constitutes a war by dubious confessions cautious regress to the evolution curve and then wantonly reactionary. While each downs proves that the Japanese government will not fundamentally change the substance to the concept. However, this form of change is worth exploring. Since the end of the Second World War, the Japanese government's view of the fundamental nature of war and the general direction basically have not been fatal shaking. The constant ups and downs in the process to slide into the abyss of extreme rightist and reactionary.This article holds that the different international condition, conservative and right-wing forces in Japan's political influence determine to a large extent the Japanese rightist politicians and reactionary view of the war degree view of the war led to the evolution of this paper is to be adopted as an international background and the ruling mainstream forces composite clues Japan's postwar political history of the war will be divided into four stages of evolution to explain and seek from all directions. Multi-angle objective analysis of the reasons for this evolution.This paper is divided into three parts : Part I : Japan's postwar political circles'war views evolution stages. Japan's ruling by the mainstream forces in the international condition and leads to the compound, The Japanese government will be 60 years since the end of World War II, history of the evolution of the war,is divided into four phases, namely : Allied army occupation -- vague "100 million total repentance."; 50-80 era of the early 1990s -- the traditional conservative outlook cautious backward; Before the early 1980s to the end of the Cold War -- the neo-conservative temple, the escalation of war responsibility problem; After the end of the Cold War since the return to power -- the neo-conservative, reactionary view of tough.Part II : Causes of Japan's postwar political circles'evolution of war history. Include : the profound impact of the character and ideology; Conservative forces manipulated, conservative right-wing press campaigns and the overall impact and penetration of each other, forming a vicious circle; International environmental factors in different periods.Part III : Conclusion... |
PDF Full Text Request