Font Size: a A A

The Research Of Feasibility On Maximal Oxygen Uptake (VO2max) Measuring By Constant-load Exercise

Posted on:2010-05-17Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:M LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2144360275488388Subject:Human Movement Science
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective: Through researching the value of VO2max which measured by incremental-load, 100% and 110%vVO2max constant-load exercise, in order to offer the feasibility of using constant-load exercise to measure VO2max in laboratory. To observe the relationship between VO2max, VO2max Pleteau Duration, the lasting time of vVO2max (tlimvVO2max) and the time to exhaustion (Tlim) of male students of physical education, supply more selective measuring methods for popularizing scientific exercise.Materials and Methods: Collecting 195 VO2max protocols measured by incremental-load exercise of male students from Wuhan Institute of Physical Education ( age: 21.87±2.20y,height:173±3.50cm,weight:64.6±4.06kg ), take the velocity which reached VO2max when measured by incremental-load exercise as 100%vVO2max constant-load exercise. The average value of 100%vVO2max is 16.32±1.12km·h-1. One of 15 participated in other two tests which exercised at 100% and 110%vVO2max constant-load exercise as long as possible until they were totally exhausted. Take the value below 5% of VO2max as the plateau value, the time of the plateau value is defined as VO2maxPD. The time to exhaustion (Tlim) at three tests were measured by a stopwatch. We analyzed all results by 15s and 30s respectively(The expired air were averaged by every 15s or 30s). All protocols were dealt by SPSS 13.0.Results:1. The value of VO2max measured by incremental-load exercise, 100%vVO2max and 110%vVO2max constant-load exercise are 3434±359ml/min, 3554±349ml/min, 3660±428ml/min, respectively. There is no great significant difference between incremental-load exercise and constant-load exercise(P > 0.05).2. There is a great significant difference of Tlim among incremental-load exercise, 100%vVO2max and 110%vVO2max constant-load exercise(P﹤0.01). The value are 596.87±61.48s, 214.0±77.65s, 144.6±53.12s, respectively. The Tlim of constant-load exercise is longer than incremental-load exercise.3. There is a great significant difference of tlimvVO2max among incremental-load exercise, 100% vVO2max and 110%vVO2max constant-load exercis(eP﹤0.01). The value are 93.87±44.63s, 208.07±54.65s, 144.73±52.90s, respectively. And the tlimvVO2max of constant-load exercise is much shorter.4. There is no great significant difference of VO2maxPD among incremental-load ex- ercise, 100%vVO2max and 110%vVO2max constant-load exercise(P > 0.05), and the value are 71±35.62s, 67±32.50s, 56±30.78s, respectively.Conclusions: 1. There is no great difference of VO2max between constant-load exercise and incremental-load exercise, indicate that we can take constant-load exercise as a laboratory way to measure VO2max.2. It can reach one's VO2max in2-7min, at least 2min, when measured VO2max by constant-load exercise.3. When we measured VO2max by constant-load exercise in laboratory, it's more fitting to take 100%vVO2max as the intensity of constant-load exercise than 110% vVO2max.
Keywords/Search Tags:Maximal Oxygen Uptake, vVO2max, incremental-load exercise, constant-load exercise, time to exhaustion
PDF Full Text Request
Related items