Study On The Medical Scientists And Technicians Evaluation Index System And Systemic Evaluation Method

The evaluation of medical scientists and technicians is not only one of the most important parts in the management but also the foundation work. The research of the evaluation of medical scientists and technicians started late in our country. In current situation, the phenomenon of simplification and subjectivism of the evaluation of medical scientists and technicians still exists. And the merit system is unilateral and lacks of scientism. Accordingly, to build up a synthetical system which is scientific, objective, overall, quantificational and qualitative, maneuverable and accordant with the fundamental realities of the country is the necessary and basic work of the medical and research management that is used for the elementary selection of the medical and science research persons. And it is of great importance of strengthening the democratization and science construction of the decision of medical and science management.MethodThis research aims at evaluating the current work of the evaluation of medical scientists and technicians. It based on the evaluation of the talented person's comprehensive character, using Delphi method to carry on two questionnaires of 30 experts who engage in personnel management, scientific research management, medicine health scientific research, clinical medical service and social sciences research, and mainly come from administration of public health control section, two medicine colleges and universities and 3 three level of first-class hospitals.The experts investigation questionnaires were accomplished by analyzing the medical and science talented persons, by studying the comprehensive character of them from the angle of system theory, on the basic work of full investigation, making reference to a great deal of data and consulting with the experts, and also according to tests of the dissimilarity of target and property. According to two rounds results of the experts consultation, we coordinated and analyzed the results by statistics. The experts' opinions are colligated to the index systems of the evaluation of the medical and science talented persons, using AHP method to ascertain determine weight coefficient of each index and establish a medical scientists and technicians authentication index system. Fuzzy method is used to build the Establish the medical scientists and technicians systemic evaluation method.Description statistics is adopted to analyze structure of the consultative committee. Making use of the index of activity and authorization of experts to exam the expert consults reliability and representation. The data all adopts SPSS 13.0 softwares to carry on statisticsing process.ResultElementary build of index systemIn making reference to the base of the related index system, the content of the evaluation of the medical and science technology talented person was disassemble and detailed. By the principles of scientism, integrality and feasibility, the index system is elementarily completed by the buildup of Basic quality, academic and service, scientific research achievement 3 first-class indexes, 9 second-class indexes, 28 third-class indexes. And the investigation questionnaires also worked.The first-turn inquiry, according to the experts' feedback opinions, the index was filtrate and supplemented. "Social morals" and "the occupation morals", the 2 third-class indexes, were combined into second-class index "scientific research morals". Delete index in"the business technical ability". Delete "the research experience" index. Delete" academic exchanges" index, simplify the investigation contents of the "academic and duty", only reserve the "academic principalship " and" academic honor" index, and consider these two indexes as second-class index. At"the research accomplishment" aspect, in consideration of the dissimilarity of the research realm should be evaluated differently, Copyright registration, New medicine certificate, Medical instrument research and development, Research and development base, indexesIn the second-turn inquiry, we asked experts to judge each of them with a value from 1 to 5 according to their relative importance. The identification by the low limit of 3.5 in means and the upper limit of 0.2500 in variance as screening standard, simultaneously unified expert's concrete opinion, further carried on screening and the revision to the index frame and the indexes connotationThrough the process of analyzing, selecting and complementing the index, the system of the evaluation of medical scientists and technicians was finally built up by "Basic quality", "Academic attainments" and "Scientific research achievement" 3 first-class indexes, 11 second-class indexes, 16 third-class indexes.The confirmation of weight of indexTo different methods are adopted in this research on confirming the importance of each indexes. As confirming the first-class indexes, required the experts to compare the 3 first-class indexes accroding to Satty relative importance table, and the weight was calculated using AHP method. Herewith, calculated the weight of each experts, calculated the means of the weigh of every index, obtains represents the expert community opinion the comprehensive weight. As confirming the weight of the first-class and the second-class indexes, made use the difference means of each index confirm Saaty mark, the weight was calculated using standardized summation after transferring the importance into judgment matrix. The result displays that the evaluation index system tally with logical concordance demands, CR＜0.1, account for the indexes weights of each class is scientific and objective. Determined the medical scientists and technicians evaluation index system 3 kinds of total 30 indexes weights.Reliability analysis of expert inquiryTwo turns expert inquiry questionnaires effectively recovery rate reached 100.0%. It well reflected that the consulted experts' supports and the approbation to this research. By the analysis of the basic circumstance of the experts, the experts who are representative are in extensive range, high level and reasonable constitution. And the authority coefficient of index is above 0.85, hereby, the tuning extent of the two inquisitions is meaningful in statistics, and the result's authentic degree is high.The build up of the systemic evaluation modelAccording to the feature and rules of the medical science research, using Fuzzy method with weighted average appraisal model, the model of medical scientists and technicians evaluation has been built up.The practical application of the index system and systemic evaluation methodBy collecting actual samples, the index system of medical scientists and technicians evaluation and the comprehensive evaluation can be measured andvalidated. By the analysis of the use of the system of evaluation, the index system adapts to the elementary selection of medical research persons in the medical scientists and technicians management department. It can reflect the true level of the examination objects, having the good function and maneuverability. It is a good guidance that is valuable in distinguishing medical scientists and technicians.Analysis of reliability and validityCronbach alpha of the evaluation index system is 0.935. It was found that in Spearman correlation analysis value of items vs. its superior grade item had higher correlation coefficient than value of items vs. other grade item.Design the medical scientists and technicians evaluation index systemAs the network and information-based development, and in order to effect the work of medical scientists and technicians evaluation, a set of system of medical scientists and technicians comprehensive evaluation are designed basing on the preceding study. Lamination modulation design method is used in the system, and each module can be dismantled and combined according to the client's request to satisfy the individual requirement. By the management of information system, the processing data can be collected extensively, quickly and efficiently. The function attains to carry out the information system to minimum investment and satisfy the applied request of the modem transacts automation completely. It could promotes the work of the science and technology management greatly.ConclusionThe Delphi method has the peculiaritis of anonymity, information feedback and analysis of results. The advantage is that the sample data isn't needed, and the experts can judge only by the connotation and the extension of the evaluation index. Herewith, it can be widely used. Domestic and international experience expresses the Delphi method as solves the non- structure question effective method, is of great importance of the scientific decision and the democratization. But the disadvantage is that the experts' understanding of the index is unavoidable restricted by subjective factors. So the expert's choice influences the authentic degree and effects of the study result directly. Experts of this research involve extensively, and are full in consideration of their academics representation and regional representation. The experts' knowledge structure levels are high, and the working experience is abundant.The main characteristics of the AHP method is the quantificational and the qualitative combining together, displaying the person's subjective judgment with the quantity expression and carrying on science processing, It more suits the complicated circumstance of the social science realm. By the Delphi method and AHP method to analyze the opinions of experts community can promise the objectivity of the income result. In order not to constitute too many main factors that would bring experts a great deal of work and influence the experts's judgment thus. This research takes principle of AHP method the foundation, and adopts two different kinds of methods to make the experts alter comprehension in judging, reduce the experts' workload in the meantime, do a more effectient and realistic judgment and further assure the objectivity.In order to reduce the non- quantification and fuzziness indexes and the appraisal content to the index system influence, The research use fuzzy method established the fuzzily systemic evaluation method and the step, established the medicine scientists and technicians fuzzily systemic evaluation method. The fuzzy systemic evaluation method to carry on the quantification to the non-linear appraisal domain comprehensive, thus obtains the quantification evaluation result may compared, The influence falls not definite and fuzziness indexes to the evaluation to is lowest. Further has guaranteed the appraisal scientific nature, hermeticness, the accuracy and the commeasurability.The result of practical application of the medical scientists and technicians evaluation index system and systemic evaluation method indicated, the medical scientists and technicians evaluation index system and systemic evaluation method is comprehensive synthesize and objectivity, can reflect talented person's realsituation. The evaluation system in the actual application indicated that this system is performance stable, the operation, is quickly and simply, can enhance the appraisal working efficiency effectively.