Correlation Study On Affected Region In Acute Abdominalgia And Location Diagnosis By Auricular Point

Objective: Acute abdominalgia is kind of commonly encountered disease, and the misdiagnosis of acute abdominalgia is not rare. In order to prove auricular point diagnosis had assistance in diagnosis of acute abdominalgia the concordance of the final diagnosis were comparative analyzed. We hope to ensure the auricular point diagnosis is a accessory examination and it can reduce the rate of misdiagnosis. At the same time, we want to in search of the modern theory of auricular point therapy.Method: The change regulation of reaction of auricular point was investigated in healthy people group or patients with acute abdominalgia. All subject investigated were examined by auricular point or abdominal B-ultrasoud Doppler' s or gastrointesinal endoscope.Select subject investigated : study group: one hundred patients with acute abdominalgia;the contrast group: healthy people.The course of diagnosis: All subject investigated were examined with subtense, palpation and electrotherapy of the auricular point, record the results of auricular point diagnosis. Then all subject investigated were examined by abdominal B-ultrasoud Doppler' s or gastrointesinal endoscope, then record the conserve original data. Collect the first diagnosis, in the other hand pursue the final diagnosis.The course of analysis: Comparative analyze the records in order to attain the statistical conclusion.Results: The rate of concordance of the first diagnosis with the final diagnosis were about 44%, but the rate of concordance of auricular point, abdominal B-ultrasound Doppler' s or gastrointesinal endoscope diagnosis were 92% and 93%. There has a higher concordance between auricular point and abdominal B-ultrasound Doppler' s or gastrointesinal endoscope diagnosis in acute abdominalgia, there are not remarkable difference in the statistics, P> 0. 05. There are remarkable difference between auricular point diagnosis, abdominal B-ultrasound Doppler' s, gastrointesinal endoscope diagnosis and first diagnosis, P< 0. 01. The rate of concordance between auricular point diagnosis and the final diagnosis in acute abdominalgia group is 92%, but the rate of concordance between auricular point diagnosis and the final diagnosis incontrast group is 86. 7%, so there are not remarkable difference in concordance in two groups.Conclusion: There are remarkable dominance in diagnosis of acute abdominalgia by auricular point, abdominal B-ultrasound Doppler' s or gastrointesinal endoscope. There are accuracy rate and feasibility in diagnosis of acute abdominalgia by auricular point, so auricular point diagnosis can be used as a accessory examination method of acute abdominalgia and the misdiagnosis can be decreased by auricular point. Abdominal B-ultrasound Doppler' s or gastrointesinal endoscope proved there are correlation between auricular point and the internal organs, and provide the modern theory of auricular point therapy.