| Whether take the technology as a subject or object, the basic problems of philosophy is reductionism. The inner meaning of interpretation can neither be deficiency nor be over, because the real thing is not complete under the technical properties and has a lot of non-skilled characteristics at the same time. The technology has the area belong to itself, a lot of philosophy overstep the conclusion that the technology can give. In other words, a more senior form that contains the whole technology world is not exist,and the technical form is not the whole meaning of our world too.This article divide the technology of practice from the self will as the religion, life and art. This is a process that avoid from metaphysical theory and the reductionism tha all the technical philosophy has, because this is contrary to the process of reductionism.The analysis of technical begin with the problem that the action is more essential than manufacturing; First of all, this assessment illustrate that the practice has its inherence base that can constraint the action. Obviously the principle of the world lay on the principle itself, the source of technical acting for itself maybe is the technology is not geared to itself on philosophical, Because technology itself lack the aim, technology in the process of development has none nature constraint. The inherence of technology and ethical problem is concreted here, only point a behavior to itself, it is possible to achieve the noble objectives. Therefore, the basic concept has two unified aspects. Machiavelli's question is whether the constraint of the noumenon is the moral obligation, as the master and the owner of nature,the technology has great help. The losing of the noumenon of technology has not been concerned, if the technology within the Category of tools, it wouldn't point to itself. The manufacture have priority compare with the action, it depend on the division subject and object in epistemology. According the category of Aristotle, manufacture belong to the society and the action is more free. if manufacture has real priority,it is just a effectiveness.The explication of experimentalism can not outpace our experience, If our issue of philosophy aim at the living of human being, it can not only stop here. Therefore, the noumenon of technical is still existence. Aristotle and bacon whoes technical is identical in the meaning of tools.The difference is these kind of technology is useful or useless for achieving the human nature which is a kind of intentions can point to inside and outside both.So, this article analyses the difficulties on philosophy, It is impossible to ensure the consistency between the assume the human should be in their belief and the human's development in the technical world. The purpose of movement come apart to the human 's purpose, it maybe the errors of analysis about the humanity,also can be a man depart to its nature. This is also the the basic philosophy problem. If you keep on man's social, the difficulties is technology will always be external to the human; the external force will not be a sort of human's behaviour, the more serious thing is that people will be a executor of a kind of will.Capp's philosophy of technology is direct related with the practical problem, technology only show its practical value when it is inside the society, We will not discuss how the technology imitate the functions and structure of human reasonable or not, but Capp's assertion has explain the division of value at least, that is through defending it is conscious or not. Although advocating of technical progress itself is good or bad is impossible. Because of the problems been lead is much more than been solved by technology, but Dewey also said if the difficulties bring by science,it's solution should be sought in our knowledge itself and the condition that science lay on. So the road of technology will continue. It will be a new problem that whether the humans should be isolated from this process in such activities, and the connection between societal and technological structure is sure to be existence.Nietzsche has emphasized:"Regarding the science as just the result of personate of object is enough, through a description of continuity, we learn to more and more accurately descript ourselves". "All things will not follow one rule to running, they seldom work at a necessity's restricting" The science seems never be able to provide an objective truth. In fact, we might finally find technology and the age of technology may just "by the desire and ability of human being, the people hope to use anything, and it will deprive all the intrinsic value of everything at the end". "all being will become a means that service the human". |
