From "the Movement Of The Cosmos" To "the Number Of The Motion"

For Aristotle's concept of time,on the one hand,it can be pushed forward to Kant's congenital sensory form (the a priori status in time),as well as the concept of Newton's absolute time (time of the mechanical dynamics, the absolute framework for the general understanding,space-time),back to back the timing of origin (this is really interactive with the provisions of a total and integrated in an integrated "Ereignis occur in itself. I am more interested in thinking back, but confined to its present level, what can I do here is not a dimension of pure back thought,but only the level of the retreat in the history of philosophy.so,this is just a preparation for the thought of timeIn the history of thinking, Aristotle had completed the two main jobs:1,his Metaphysics gives us a thorought inquiry on being under the verson of logos; 2,his Physics explore the movement in being (on). being must be moving, and the movement extend in the time, Aristotle's strict requirements on the concept of "logos, on, motion and time" ,on the one hand, has laid a solid foundation for the impact of its extension of the millennium, but its relative origin department does have a floating, it's no longer free purely and has great strength of the thinking of the real beginning germinal (the most obvious illustration is the floating which is from physis is to the physics and the conversion from on to ousia.); on the other hand,it still have to return to the origin of the retained opportunity to be thinking of future generations of its ongoing tracing to its source text and the interpretation of original problems.Under the version of regarding Aristotle as "the limit of the first beginning, and the beginning of the second origin ",This article seeks to interpret Aristotle's concept and thesis of time in Physics.The first chapter is an interpretation about Aristotle's domain correlated conception under the version of the original thought in the pre-Socrates philosophy, such as"peras,arithmos,cosmos and metapole",reveals its basic ideological origins and evolution of these thinking words. the second and third chapters is to capture the ideological relevance between Plato and Aristotle by exploring the thinking of time.The second chapter focused on exploring Plato's concept of the universe and the non-original time,and Aristotle inherited fundamentally Plato's thought about the non-original position of time(as the concept of the movement of Cosmos), but there is a significant difference between them(for time is just this,number of moton in respect of "before and after"); The third Chapter seeks to explore the source of the beginning of physical time and what his provisions about time focus on (to save the phenomenon and lay the foundation for the motion.), investigate the concept of "now" and "before and after". The postscript is a summary about the author's confused history on the phenomenon of time,and the motivation of continuing to explore the phenomenon of time.