| Every era has its own problems,and true philosophical criticism needs to be based on the philosophical problems and philosophical reflections of the current era.Marx said,“The problem is the open,fearless voice of the age that sways all individuals.The problem is the slogan of the age,the most practical cry of its expression of its own state of mind”.With the advent of the AI era,digital smart technology has brought about a big change in the human lifeworld like never before.In the digitally dominated life world,intelligent technology reconstructs human production relations,interaction relations and common life style through data models and algorithms,and this change is no longer the traditional form of invasion of life in the form of objects,but from the cultural point of view,to enter the human life world in the form of “digitally encoded culture”,quietly filtering our perception of the world,and quietly filtering our perception of the world,and silently filtering our perception of the world,and quietly filtering our perception of the world.This change is no longer in the form of objects invading our lives,but in the form of a “digitally coded culture” that enters the world of human life,silently filtering our perceptions of the world and shaping our thoughts.At present,we are all addicted to the terminals of intelligent technology,creating a “digital social way of life”through our own digital behaviour.In the context of digital intelligent ordering of existence,human existence also has its own dilemma,the most typical symptom of which is the “decline of the community lifestyle”,in the context of algorithmic discrimination,body coding,alienation of digital labour,human beings have become “one-way users”,and the individuality is lost.The disordered extension of individuality and the infinite expansion of intelligent technology constitute a contemporary symptom of human existence,which makes it particularly urgent to rethink the survival pattern of human beings in the context of intelligent technology and to seek possible survival strategies.The study of cultural community in the age of AI is based on the narrative background and theoretical premise of the change of digital intelligence technology,and puts the theories of "community","alienated labour" and "science of man" in the context of Marx’s philosophical thought,clarifies the meaning and limits of the traditional "cultural community",and reconstructs the cultural community under the modern paradigm of community.The study puts the theories of "community","alienated labour" and "human science" in Marx’s philosophical thought into the context of the times,clarifies the meaning of the traditional "cultural community" and its limitations,and reconstructs the connotation of the cultural community under the modern paradigm of the community,so that the study of "AI" can be carried out in an interdisciplinary perspective.In an interdisciplinary perspective,the "cultural community in the age of AI" is regarded as a way of human association in the age of artificial intelligence,as a practical strategy to eliminate cultural anxiety and abandon the alienation of digital labour,and to realize the exploration of the possibility of the normative dimension of the era.The "cultural community" in the age of AI is not a "union of cultures",and it does not aim to negate all cultural traditions and existing cultural forms,let alone to strengthen a certain community through the mode of "community" in the spatial category of reality and virtuality.It is not to negate all cultural traditions and existing cultural forms,nor to reinforce a particular culture in the real and virtual spatial context through the model of "community".History has taught us that a single culture cannot gain long-lasting vitality,nor can it solve the predicament of human existence;on the contrary,it will obliterate human diversity and creativity,and banish the value of human existence.At a time when data models and algorithms are widely used and generative AI is developing exponentially,multiculturalism is faced with a situation where culture is intelligently encoded through the processing of data samples in the process of digital generation,becoming a "digital presence" in the model material library,and human culture condensed through history and practice is no longer a "digital presence".The human culture condensed through history and practice is no longer generated from the qualities of human creativity and diversity of values,but is "intelligently" "generated" from the model of the data,and this generation mode is "logical" and "random".This mode of generation is both "logical" and "random",in other words,"digital is cultural".In other words,"digital is culture".As a result,the cultural anxiety brought about by the generalisation of digital culture and the alienation of digital labour have become the reality of human existence.The historicity,uniqueness,wholeness,and intellectuality of culture will also be gradually generalised with the digitalisation of human biological nature.In particular,the development of interembeddedness between AI technologies and the connection between intelligences have formed a "consciously" intelligent technological community,and the generation of such a community will not only exacerbate the datamaterialisation of human biological nature,making "digital life" a necessity of the time,but also a way of life in the form of a kind of "digital life".This community will not only intensify the digitisation of human biological nature,making "digital life" a necessity of the times,but also intervene in our production life in an "immersive" and "intertwined" way and open up a new theoretical paradigm of digital humanities.This makes the digitalisation of culture a historical inevitability,and in such an inevitable process,the game between culture and digital is inevitable,which requires human culture to move towards a kind of community,which is not to seek a unified culture,but to condense the differences and consensus between culture and culture,between human beings and human beings,and between the virtual and the real through the common cultural memories,and to contradict and to understand,to respect and to tolerate,and to blame and to reconstruct,which is to be based on Marxist theory.The aim of Marx’s "true community" is to establish an "organic interconnectedness".The cultural community in the AI era is an autonomous community with normative characteristics,which reconstructs the relationship between people by taking "trust","cooperation" and "sharing" as its functional mechanisms.With "trust","cooperation" and "sharing" as the functional mechanism,it reconstructs the relationship between human beings,establishes the "human scale" for the scientific and technological community in the age of AI and the interaction and collaboration between human organs,reflects the purpose and value of human beings and integrates them into the spirit of human culture,and interprets the real value of the survival of human beings.Of course,the "cultural community in the age of AI" may not be a more worthwhile form of community in the age of AI,but it must be a form of community that is closest to the "ideal" form of community.At present,it may only be an imaginary community,but this imaginary community can transcend the scope of time and space through imagination,perceive an intercultural order,experience,shape and strengthen individuality,and at the same time find a sense of group existence,so that "digital nomads" return to their spiritual home,return to the community’s way of life,and confirm the individuality of the community.This will allow "digital nomads" to return to their spiritual home and community lifestyle,and confirm the friendship,respect and responsibility between individuals and groups,which is a realistic care for digital life under the human-computer model. |
