| Distributed-system observation is foundational to understanding and controlling distributed computations. Existing tools for distributed-system observation are constrained in the size of computation that they can observe by three fundamental problems. They lack scalable information collection, scalable data-structures for storing and querying the information collected, and scalable information-abstraction schemes. This dissertation addresses the second of these problems.;Two core problems were identified in providing a scalable data structure. First, in spite of the existence of several distributed-system-observation tools, the requirements of such a structure were not well-defined. Rather, current tools appear to be built on the basis of events as the core data structure. Events were assigned logical timestamps, typically Fidge/Mattern, as needed to capture causality. Algorithms then took advantage of additional properties of these timestamps that are not explicit in the formal semantics. This dissertation defines the data-structure interface precisely, and goes some way toward reworking algorithms in terms of that interface.;The second problem is providing an efficient, scalable implementation for the defined data structure. The key issue in solving this is to provide a scalable precedence-test operation. Current tools use the Fidge/Mattern timestamp for this. While this provides a constant-time test, it requires space per event equal to the number of processes. As the number of processes increases, the space consumption becomes sufficient to affect the precedence-test time because of caching effects. It also becomes problematic when the timestamps need to be copied between processes or written to a file. Worse, existing theory suggested that the space-consumption requirement of Fidge/Mattern timestamps was optimal. In this dissertation we present two alternate timestamp algorithms that require substantially less space than does the Fidge/Mattern algorithm. |
