Font Size: a A A

Structure-function studies with the cAMP receptor protein of Escherichia coli

Posted on:2004-01-23Degree:Ph.DType:Dissertation
University:Texas Tech UniversityCandidate:Tutar, YusufFull Text:PDF
GTID:1460390011971600Subject:Chemistry
Abstract/Summary:
Cyclic AMP Receptor protein (CRP) regulates the transcription of more than 100 genes. Cyclic AMP binding induces a structure change in CRP that promotes its interaction with RNA polymerase and DNA. CRP is a dimer of identical subunits. A CRP subunit is composed of two domains. The larger N-terminal domain binds the allosteric effector, cAMP. The C-terminal domain contains a helix-turn-helix motif that binds specific DNA sequences.; The structure of CRP in the absence of cAMP is unknown, therefore the details of the allosteric mechanism mediated by CAMP remain obscure. The allosteric conformational change in CRP upon binding CAMP can be understood by comparing CRP and the CRP-CAMP complex by similar biophysical characterization. Several groups have used Raman spectroscopy, and circular dichroism techniques to compare these two different states of CRP. These methods used high concentrations of salt, to improve CRP solubility. Our laboratory has used Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) along with STIR cards to overcome the problems of protein solubility and high salt concentration. Analysis of the Amide I region indicated a secondary structure distribution of 35% □-helix, 31% □-sheet, 21% turn, and 13% unordered for both states of WT and its E72D, E72Q, and R82Q mutants. This result is consistent with X-ray analysis of CRP-cAMP2 (37% □-helix, 36% □-sheet).; Fluorimetric binding studies showed that cAMP binding exhibits negative cooperativity in CAMP binding to the second subunit. The level of □-galactosidase expression in the mutants varied depending on this negative allostery. Since, under the conditions utilized in this study, CAMP makes no contact with the DNA-binding domains, it cannot induce a conformational change in them by direct interaction. This suggests that CAMP induces a change in the relative orientation of the two subunits because it binds close to the subunit interaction area. This change could be relayed to the DNA binding domain and could change the relative position and orientation of the recognition helices and the activity.; Thus these results can explain the allosteric transition mediated by the binding of cyclic AMP that converts CRP from a protein having low DNA activity to one that exhibits high, sequence-specific, affinity for DNA.
Keywords/Search Tags:CRP, AMP, Protein, DNA, Structure, Binding, Change
Related items