Font Size: a A A

Moderate protein intake: Effects on body composition and metabolic risk factors and comparison of body composition assessment methods

Posted on:2007-09-25Degree:Ph.DType:Dissertation
University:Purdue UniversityCandidate:Mahon, Anne KeatingFull Text:PDF
GTID:1454390005984537Subject:Health Sciences
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Higher-protein (HP) diets are frequently used to enhance weight loss. Short-term HP studies lasting less than 6 months report inconsistent findings, while studies lasting 12-18 months consistently report no enhanced effect. Its effects on body weight, body composition, and cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors solely in overweight postmenopausal women have not been studied. In addition, less is known regarding the effects of protein source. Accordingly, 54 overweight postmenopausal women were instructed to consume 1 of 3 energy-restricted (ER), isocaloric diets for 9 weeks. The HP diets provided 26% protein with either beef or chicken as the primary protein source. The lower protein (LP), lacto-ovo vegetarian diet provided 16% protein. A control group followed their habitual diet. ER groups lost 9% body weight, 13% fat mass (FM), and 5% fat-free mass (FFM). The amount of decrease was not different among ER groups for FM and FFM. Weight loss was greater for women who consumed the HP-chicken vs. LP diet. ER decreased total and LDL cholesterol, but was not different among ER groups. Other CVD and metabolic biomarkers did not change.; A subset of 27 women from the ER groups underwent body composition assessment utilizing hydrostatic weighing (HW), air-displacement plethysmography (ADP), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and measurement of total body water using deuterium oxide isotope dilution (D2O). The four-component (4C) model with body volume from HW (4CHW) was the criterion method. 4C model with body volume from ADP (4CADP) was also compared. No group method differences were detected for changes (Delta) in percent body fat (%BF), DeltaFM, and DeltaFFM among 4CHW, HW, ADP, DXA, D2O, and 4CADP. Results between methods for individual women differed widely. Compared to 4CHW, 4CADP overestimated Delta%BF by 1.4 %, DeltaFM by 0.6 kg and underestimated DeltaFFM by 1.2 kg. Regression models were acceptable for %BF (4CADP, 2CHW, and 2C D2O), FM and FFM (4CADP, 3CDXA, 2CHW, and 2CD2O), but not for other methods. Larger studies are needed to develop population-specific regression equations to relate 2C- and 3C-models to a 4C-model estimate of Delta in body composition. Lastly, ER groups lost weight, but no diet effect was demonstrated.
Keywords/Search Tags:Body composition, Protein, Weight, Diet, 4CADP, Metabolic, Effects
PDF Full Text Request
Related items