Font Size: a A A

Turbulent Boundary Layers Perturbed by an Array of Cylinder

Posted on:2018-02-22Degree:Ph.DType:Dissertation
University:University of MinnesotaCandidate:Tan, Yan MingFull Text:PDF
GTID:1440390005953753Subject:Aerospace engineering
Abstract/Summary:
Turbulent boundary layers (Retau = 2500) were perturbed by a spanwise array of cylinders, and the effects on the large-scale flow organization within the logarithmic layer were investigated. Boundary layer and vortex packet recovery trends were quantified downstream of several arrays. Two array spacings, each with two cylinder heights were considered. For S = 0.2delta arrays, cylinder heights of H = 0.2delta (H+ = 500, aspect ratio, AR = 4) and H = delta (H+ = 2500, AR = 20) were investigated. For the S = 0.6delta arrays, cylinder heights were H = 0.2delta and H = 0.05delta (H+ = 125, AR = 1).;Stereoscopic and planar PIV measurements were acquired in both fixed and flying configurations at three measurement heights across the logarithmic layer, z+ = 125, 300 and 500. Furthermore, 3-D PTV volumes were acquired downstream of the S= 0.2delta arrays over a depth of 155 < z+ < 465. Results of time-averaged velocity statistics, instantaneous velocity fields and structural analyses of low and high uniform streamwise momentum zones were discussed. In addition, a vortex packet identification algorithm (VPIA) was developed to quantify relaxation trends of individual packet signatures in the flow downstream of the arrays.;All of the arrays affected mean and RMS streamwise velocities averaged across the span downstream, due to the blockage posed to the oncoming flow. Undulating wakes due to Karman shedding occurred behind the cylinders, while the average wake structure at the cylinder tips suggested formation of streamwise aligned tip vortices.;For the S = 0.2delta array, relaxation trends differed for the two cylinder heights, H = 0.2delta and H = delta. Downstream of the H = delta array, instantaneous PIV and VPIA results showed a bottom-up mechanism for the recovery of the large-scale flow organization. Flow features recovered first closer to the wall (z+ = 125), then later at z + = 300, while hardly any recovery was seen at z+ = 500 up to 7delta downstream of the array, the furthest measurement location. In contrast, some indications of top-down recovery were observed for the flow perturbed by the shorter H = 0.2delta array. In this case, however, flow features and packets closer to the wall at z+ = 125 remained altered up to 7delta downstream, even though streamwise velocity statistics relaxed substantially to the unperturbed values. The difference in recovery trends between the two cylinder heights was related to weaker and stronger outer-inner interactions respectively, relative to the unperturbed flow. F.;or the S = 0.6delta arrays, perturbations to mean and RMS velocity statistics were weaker than for the S = 0.2delta arrays as blockage was reduced substantially. Nevertheless, the flow downstream of the S = 0.6delta, H = 0.2delta array was profoundly affected, such that the energy contained in the 0.6delta spanwise wavelength was increased throughout the logarithmic layer over a distance of 7delta. The energy increase was related to the array preferentially re-aligning incoming high and low uniform momentum zones to spanwise locations corresponding to cylinder locations and the regions between them respectively. The re-alignment effects were stronger for low and high momentum zones that were longer than 0.5delta. The H = 0.05delta case also showed similar but much weaker trends.
Keywords/Search Tags:Array, Cylinder, Layer, Boundary, Perturbed, Momentum zones, Trends, Flow
Related items