The Research On The The Modern Dispute Between Madhyamaka And Yogacara

In the history of Buddhist thought,the concept of wisdom is called the empty cases,there were wears Consciousness is called,so the debate Prajna between meso and wears Consciousness is called Empty dispute.The central question is the dispute between Madhyamaka and Yogacara school,because almost scholars have talked about it and gave their own opinion.Aiming at this problem,there were three ideas.Chapter three is talk about Traditional idea which from Chinese tradition.The Traditional idea been to show through four characters,include Yang Wenhui,Zhou Shujia,Fa Fang,and Ju zan.Chapter four is to show Tibet idea,which selected Fazun and Yinshun as the representative.Chapter five is to show the original idea which is different with two idea before.Due to the structure,three ideas are discussed separately,but not so clear distinction between the three ideas.Based on the above three ideas of study,identify the basic features of the concept and its core issues Consciousness,that the concept is based on two truths as the center of the Insight is the core of the three,both in the Two Truths and three of the existence of the dispute during the match,which according to him the property is empty,Alaya need to empty the concept of whether extinguished.For further discussion of this concept and we Idealism,for a holistic understanding of Mahayana Buddhism has important significance.The first chapter reviews the recent rise of modern Buddhism had plenty of fight in the background.Modern,with the revival wears Consciousness Studies,passing three books on the return and Tibetan Studies meso,meso and Consciousness explore representations of argumentation has become one of the focal issues of Buddhist studies.The second chapter traces the history had plenty of dispute,the dispute had plenty of problems discussed.First,the concept were combing the legendary teacher and Consciousness on controversial cases,the event;secondly,through the"Mahayana palm Jane" and the "broad interpretive theory precepts hundred disciples of goods" debate discussion,in view of the cases and only knowledge of these debates in argumentation level comes down to three questions:According to him the property is empty,whether Anritsu Alaya,whether the air is extinguished concept of learning.The third chapter discusses the continuation of traditional thinking in modern times,including a weekly t-Gad,France Fang,giant praised as the most representative.The idea is,"according to him the nature" of the hub to be through air,there is.Week t-Gad according to his nature through play is empty bps,insisted empty or without dispute,but on the other hand,in the discussion of the origins of the eight cases,the expression of one or the other as the source of the two had plenty of ideas,mutual conflicting views reflect his traditional Buddhist lay position.France Fang on to the concept,as the representative of Mahayana Buddhism Consciousness taking a critical attitude,because he believes that not only changed the Mahayana "primitive Buddhism" spirit,tend to make Buddhist philosophy,but also let Hinduism chances.In view of the criticism on the position of Consciousness,France Fang not only thought to play according to his nature is empty,but in the presence of contention ignores inference empty "true" Jane else on the basis of clearly expressing a disregard for Mahayana Buddhism.Giant praise before 1956,through his concept of "New Three" Two Truths investigation that empty or without dispute.However,in 1956 after huge praise for the concept,Consciousness and two were not strictly Jane,and this simply do not have sufficient evidence to show that it is affected in view of Tibetan Studies.Huge difference in pre-and post praise on the "Empty dispute" point of view,can show the traditional idea of the policy of "empty whether the dispute" is a Chinese Buddhist tradition followed this line of thought.The fourth chapter discusses the concept of Tibetan Studies under the background of the dispute had plenty of ideas about its Tibetan representative is subject to greater impact in view of law and respect for Yinshun.Respect for the law in view of the introduction of Tibetan school principal is Tsongkhapa's doctrine,praised the concept of what should be a school for most,self-empty,empty Jane fundamental differences between him and the Consciousness of other meso.Yinshun after contacting the concept of Tibetan Studies,return Nagarjuna's "Dazhidulun," but he was on "Empty dispute" This issue is obviously influenced by the concept of Tibetan Studies,the same self-empty and His other two empty to Jane.He also proposed" "in theory "is" Agama "The General Theory" point of view,I hope to be sentenced Buddha taught this subject had plenty.Tibetan basic idea that "there had plenty of fight",follow the concept of Tibetan tradition,to the concept of how to form the Chinese Buddhist tradition distinct differences.The fifth chapter is to discuss ideas for creative,think this idea into a more groundbreaking thinking,Ouyang not even with the Void as the main representative.Ouyang not even by asking,"Nagarjuna wears learn," "Two Truths nature","a case of the Two Holy" three propositions,wears in a broader study on the basis of uniform meso and Consciousness.Void in eight equal pursuit of "holding system" spirit,to sentence taken in view of the controversy Consciousness,he thinks empty or without dispute,and there is an indisputable think it takes the concept of Tibetan Studies conducted a savage attack.The characteristics of the original idea into a new idea that has a strong pioneering spirit,not follow the Chinese or Tibetan Buddhist concept of learning in the tradition.The sixth chapter is to explore the impact of modern Buddhism had plenty of fight the right.Three kinds of ideas,the traditional idea of standing pat,no successor to the original idea of the basic Tibetan Buddhist idea of the study is a continuation of the strait is better.By exploring Taiwan "after Yinshun era" controversy,reveal discussions around Yinshun expanded basic stance can be seen as there were cases of empty criticism.