Research On The Relationship Between The Chinese Communist Party And Social Organizations In The Perspective Of Modern Governance

The Third Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee of the Party put forward the goal of national governance system and the modernization of state governance capability,which greatly expanded the space for national and social reform and innovation.The Communist Party of China,as the ruling party of the country,is in the leading position in the socialist modernization drive and the important subject and leading core of China’s national governance modernization.As an important subject of state governance,social organization plays an important role in policy advocacy,perfecting public service mechanism,communicating state and society,shaping public atmosphere and integrating public resources,and the development of social organization is directly related to the improvement of national governance structure and Optimization of National Governance Mechanism.To achieve the strategic goal of national governance modernization,how to deal with the relationship between the party and the social organization has become an urgent problem to be solved.The Communist Party of China,based on the Marxist theory of the state,has formed a governance logic with Chinese characteristics after a long period of revolution and construction practice.From the perspective of the use of the concept of "governance" and "state governance"by the Chinese Communists in the sense of national governance,the basic meaning is that under the leadership of the Communist Party of China,it follows the prescriptions of the people’s democratic dictatorship and is based on the fundamental interests of the party and the people Consistency,in the socialist market economic development and social change under the new historical conditions,in accordance with science,democracy,according to law and effectiveness to optimize and innovate the leadership and governance,optimization and innovation of the ruling system and the national management system,Optimize and enhance the ability to govern,to achieve democracy and the rule of law,national and social common,government and citizen co-governance,thus achieving national and social harmony and long-term stability.The distinctive feature of this governance is that the Chinese Communist Party in the governance of the overall situation,co-ordinate the parties.Under the leadership of the party,the formation of party leadership,government responsibility,social coordination,public participation,the rule of law to protect the governance pattern.In this pattern of governance in the Chinese context,the relationship between the Chinese Communist Party and the social organization is undoubtedly manifested as the relationship between leadership and leadership.But the national governance modernization has its new requirements,the party’s leadership of social organizations should be a leadership of the past leadership and sublimation of the leadership relationship,this leadership should grasp the adherence to soft control,optimize the hard control;adhere to socialization,service;Adhere to diversification;adhere to optimize the party itself and other principles.In reality,to meet the requirements of modernization of governance,the party has many explorations of the leadership of social organizations,such as the party and government or the party organization of social organization work system;political,party and government division of the social organization of work system;Party-led social organization work system and so on.However,these explorations still exist that the orientation of.the party’s policy supply is unclear;the party’s lack of viability in the organization of the social organization’s work organization;the lack of three major problems in the way and institutional mechanisms of social organization leadership.The problems in these practices have deep-seated reasons.First,in the long-term revolution and construction practice,the Communist Party of China has led the social organization to form the concept of leadership.Secondly,under the influence of this kind of leadership concept,Organizational political power relations,dependent power relations,institutional authority relations,structural power relations of the inertial leadership model.These traditional concepts and inherent patterns together constitute the "dependence path" of the Communist Party of China leading social organizations,restricting and influencing the ability and level of the party to lead social organizations.At the same time,the political security of the development of social organizations can effectively protect,but also test and influence the party’s ability and level of social organization.To make the leadership of the Communist Party of China more in line with the requirements of the modernization of governance,we must break through the "path dependence",must deal with the great development of social organizations and social security organizations to ensure the relationship between the two,which requires innovation to the leadership of social organizations The way and the path.The innovation of the way and the path should start from the following aspects:First,the development of social relations;the second is to build a diversified service mechanism;Third,the party to strengthen the cultivation of social organizations.In general,we need to change the concept of leading social organizations in the deepening of the reform requires the modernization of state governance system and governance capability.The grassroots party organizations need to transform the function,explore and innovate the ways and means of social leadership.So that the social organization has played its own role,and naturally accept the leadership of the party,can effectively promote the strong leadership of our party,the state and society,the market and the government,leaders and the masses can give full play to their initiative,and ultimately the formation of society.Market and government of mutual coordination,complement each other to order the development of modern governance situation.