| After the "Cultural Revolution", along with the modernity of enlightenment restart, subjectivity principle has been established; Chinese aesthetic modernity began its new historical process. Reflected in the field of literature and art theories, on the one hand is criticism for the quick success of art tools, promote the aesthetic get rid of the dependency of the narrow political towards independence and autonomy, on the other hand, through the discussion on the theory of realism and modernism, aesthetic modernity contained the epistemological and ontological content and its pattern of development to the subjective and objective aspects of differentiation confrontation initially revealed.After the mid-1980s, with literature and art practice and theory dramatically turn inward; the aesthetic modernity of subjective and objective aspects of dynamic balance was broken. Because the ancient objective imitate was mistaken for modern objective representation, on aversion to literary theory and practice of the "Cultural Revolution" was converted to refuse aesthetic objectivity, which led to the decline of cognitive reproduction of development and emotional expression of the abnormal prosperity of the theory, hiding the profound theory crisis. On the decline of cognitive reproduction not only means that social life and real life faded aesthetic vision, at the same time, also caused a loss of emotional expression on the roots and depletion of the source, so that it can only be sticking to the narrow inner and aesthetic form, pale and poor in the ethereal nothingness, repeating the ancient aesthetic closed in the past.After entering the1990s ages with the rise of consumerism and the differentiation of different class interests, aesthetic isolated the situation unsustainable. So, put in the hustle and bustle of the market, as dazzling beautiful commercial packaging, or interested in the political discourse, theoretical weapon for ideological struggle, become the new choice. But this is from the aesthetic closed to aesthetic defects, does not exceed the historical boundaries of the ancient aesthetics, the requirements of independence and expansion of aesthetic modernity were lost. This suggests that, so far, Chinese aesthetic modernity was far from out of the ancient shadows; its future development has a long way to go. Above is the whole idea and framework of the paper. The paper consists of five chapters, the first chapter mainly introduces the new period literary theories on aesthetic issues, clarify the thesis writing significance, at the same time analyze and comment Chinese aesthetic modernity theory. The second chapter discusses new period the main consciousness and literary theory for the pursuit of aesthetic independence, including negation of the art tools, humanitarian theory and establishment of the main modern aesthetic subjectivity principle etc...The third chapter discusses new period literary aesthetic modernity, analysis and study of new period realistic literary theory construction, mainly from two aspects of aesthetic objectivity and aesthetic subjectivity, as well as around the misty and modernist expanded theoretical discussion. The fourth chapter discusses trend the purification of the aesthetic literary theory, reveal the underlying reasons of the prosperous and crisis, mainly relate the aesthetic theory of reflection, aesthetic ideology and aesthetic psychology disciplines formed, literature has a tendency to turn inward the main theory and the aesthetic appreciation, formal ontology based on the linguistic turn. The fifth chapter discusses aesthetic generalization and digestion in the market context; the main contents include the social transformation and aesthetic tendencies in the critique of mass culture, aesthetic culture study and daily life aesthetic theory, pure literature reflection and the rise of cultural studies. |
