| Reign Security refers to that the ruling party can hold power without danger or it can maintain its ruling position by defeating and overcoming the risks from at home and abroad. Reign Security Status of the ruling party is the fundamental problem concerning the governance status of the society, the safety and danger of the state and the rise and fall of the ruling party. Under the typical framework of party-state-society, a powerful and efficient political power center is indispensable to running a political system effectively. Undoubtedly, a party or parties play a genuine role of the above-mentioned center, which is the internal logic and inevitable outcome of the contemporary party politics. However, as a modern democratic political tool, no party-system model is omnipotent. As a matter of fact, party crisis almost exist throughout the whole evolution of party politics. Once a party come into power and hold public power persistently, they (the ruling party) might go against their original intentions by abusing and even usurping power, which logically break the power assignment between the party and the society, in which the party grow and thrive. With the ruling party itself weakening and even decaying the function of"integration tool", its nature might alienate from"conflict forces"to"objects of conflict"between the state and the society, which eventually deduced the numerous sadness of the worldwide party-crisis. Will the Communist Party lose regime after they come into power? Though it is an unwelcome sensitive topic, it is an unexpected, spontaneous and inevasible problem. The ruling position of the CPC is not innate or once for all. From the very beginning of the new century, the CPC is mindful of the potential danger and stay prepared against adversities in times of peace, and has been consciously aware of the problems concerning her reign security. To warn the authorities at the risk in peaceful and prosperous times, this dissertation is devoted to coordinating relevant elements concerning the reign of CPC historically and logically.Research on the reign security of ruling party is the concern of sociology, history and politics. This dissertation aims at systematically investigating the formation and evolution of the reign security of CPC, striving to probe into the regularity of reign security under the guidance of the Marxism Materialist Dialectics and Historical Dialectics. In the study, it is carried out by integrating the methods of systematic and inquiry, analysis and synthesis, comparative and historical analysis and the innovation of systematically researching is made. Therefore the emphasis is on the multiple combinations between analysis and synthesis, qualitative and quantitative, part and whole, certainty and uncertainty, theory and case, accuracy and similarity, scientific reason and artistic intuition. The entire layout follows an individual-general-individual sequence, and the"four-in-one"analytical tool is the mainline throughout the study, which is made up of the progressiveness of the ruling party, the masses'acceptance to the party in power, the condition of the public power and performance against external intervention. However, the study adheres to"open issues and issues open"in order to avoid"principle to facts"that is off the track.The dissertation consists of introduction, main body and ending. There are six chapters in the main body. The introduction deals with background, significance, methods and framework of the research, emphatically reviewing and briefing the current situation at home and abroad of the research on the reign security of the CPC. In Chapter One, a basic theory outline is generalized and established, which starts from reviewing origin and trend of party politics. In order to probe into the nature, the experiential and scientific features of party ruling, a full consideration is made to observe and study the crisis situation of party politics and the insecurity models of party ruling. Chapter Two aims at building the fundamental theoretical frame of the feign security of the CPC. Firstly outline the traditional concepts and ideas of reign security at home and abroad, the reviewing on which does good to the CPC. Then analyze and generalize the inner logic and external aspects of the CPC on the basis of the party-state-society model. Finally a four-in-one analytical tool is concluded, including the progressiveness of the ruling party, the masses'acceptance to the party in power, the condition of the public power and performance against external intervention. Chapter Three covers the ruling practice of the CPC in the New Democracy Revolution Period, reviewing the CPC's early reign security exploration in partial areas. In Chapter Four a overall investigation is made to cover the ruling practice of the CPC since the People's Republic of China founded and some regularities and warnings of ruling practice are concluded. Starting with the new historical orientation and mission, Chapter Five copes with the current situation of the reign security of the CPC, including the challenges and opportunities that the CPC faces. Some countermeasures to maintain and consolidate the reign security of the CPC are put forward in the last chapter. To sum up, this dissertation intends to make a combination of politics paradigm and traditional party-building theory, putting forward the preliminary definition and connotation of party reign security, initiating new logical framework and analytical tool for the research on the CPC's reign security. Meanwhile new investigation and targeted measures on the CPC's ruling practice are carried out on the basis of its ruling history and current situation. As far as the reign security of the CPC is concerned, abundant room for further research is left in this dissertation. A further and considerate research ought to cover the following subjects: the further generalization of the fundamental principle of party reign security, comparative research on the reign security of different party-models, integrating research on traditional and current ideas, systems and culture of regime security and continuous interdisciplinary efforts. |