| Innovation is not a new phenomenon. It comes with human and human society. In a long history, innovation has been very important part of society, but it didn't bring the attention of human, with its contingency. With the development of science and technology revolution and society revolution, innovation has brought forth great vitality. Innovation becomes the nuclear word and a outstanding symbol of present time.Innovation has been the center topic of many subjects. How to break away from concrete level and how to put it into deep research form the philosophical level is the task of philosophical researchers. The appearance of innovative practice responses the academic appeal. It is a summary of innovation. The purpose of this article is to analyze the concept of innovative practice systemically. There are seven parts in this article.The introduction is divided into two parts. It begins with the puzzledom of Marxism epistemology in the first part since twentieth century. In the second part I will point out we must analyze the change of present practice in order to break away from the puzzledom. We can accelerate the progress of epistemology from summarizing and reflecting the change of practice.I discussed the background of innovative practice. Innovative practice is the philosophical sublimation of innovation. We must analyze the connotation, the extension and the characteristics of innovative practice in order to understand the concept properly. In order to adapt the research of Marxism epistemology, we must develop the point of practice into innovative practice.In the second chapter, I expatiate the fundamental role of innovative practice through understanding of the internal mechanism and discuss the main source of cognition, the motive force of cognition development, the inspection of cognition and the real production of cognition and so on. Then it can be conclude that innovative practice is an ultimate source of producting cognition , an ultimate motive force of developing cognition and an ultimate approach of inspecting cognition. Instead of adapting a method that other researchers divide cognition production into two stages of perceptual knowledge and rational knowledge, I divide the real producting process of cognition into a preparation phase of conventional practice and a phase of the innovative practice and point out the history of cognition development is the history of innovative practice development.In the third chapter, I discourse upon innovative practice in the view of system structure of cognition. From the point of view of cognition object, innovative practice inpel continual enrichment of the connotation of cognition object and makes a trend into reality that cognition object change from the general to the microcosmic and the macroscopical, from the real to the invented. From the point of view of cognition subject, innovative practice deepen the connotation of cognition subject and makes a trend into reality that cognition subject represents man-machine complex, diversification and specialization. Form the point of view of cognition resonance, innovative practice constantly wins through the cognition resonance and makes a trend into reality that cognition resonance represents the high-speed, high-precision , Intelligence, virtual and formal, networking, and other trends.In the fourth chapter, I choose cognition diffusion which is a new approach in the field of epistemology because of an important reason that previous researchers considers the producer and user of cognition as the same person.and the the spread of knowledge on the perspective of innovative practice. The second, the extent of diffusion is always controlled by four factors, state, enterprises, individuals and space. The third, I point out the important effect of innovative practice to cognition diffusion from mode and type.In the fifth chapter, I discuss the significance of innovative practice in the view of epistemology construction, which can be logically concluded from previous discussion. Innovative Practice is adhered to the fundamental Marxist view, embodies the spirit of the times. Innovative practice can be consecontly considered as a epistemology construction breach of contemporary Marxist theory. Epistemology based on innovative practice, achieves a change from psychological to philosophy approach, from science to social approach, from individual to unitary approach.In the conclusion, I conclude my main works and point out my intention.This article attempts to make innovation in the following aspects. The first, analyzing the connotation, the extension and the characteristics of innovative practice. The second, developing practice to innovative practice and establish the fundamental status of innovative practices in the Marxist epistemology. The third, putting forward some new ideas, such as innovative practice is an ultimate source of producting cognition , an ultimate motive force of developing cognition , an ultimate approach of inspecting cognition and the history of cognition development is the history of innovative practice development. The forth, probing into some aspects that are involved in previous epistemology, such as cognition diffusion and state, enterprises, individuals and space which is four factors affecting cognition diffusion. The fourth, according to weather using resonance , I divide cognition diffusion into three kinds, direct diffusion, indirect diffusion and mixed diffusion. According to the person that pay for cognition production, I divide it into two types, one is that the payment comes form country and government, the other is that the user purchase to cognition producer for their use. In general, every kind and every type of innovative practice of every type has an important role.The fifth, reviewing the significance of innovative practice to contemporary form of epistemology construction and indicating that innovative practice can be a breach of contemporary form of epistemology construction.As the article is involved in basic theory, it is very difficult for study. And the author's level is limited. Therefore, the specific ideas need to be further strengthened and improved for lack of deep and thorough discussion. |
