This article was written based on labor and materials, which were published by Chinese and foreign research in the fields of history of the twenties of the Soviet Union. This article is based on Marxism, on the principle of withdrawal from history, on the principle of connecting the history and theory, conclusion proved events. The main content of this article is the struggle within the twenties, especially drew attention to the debate on the development of socialist state. The purpose of this article is the discovery of substantive discussion of the struggle within 20th years, that is seeking a way for the development of socialist state. Those questions are difficult Communist party of the Soviet Union, are a source of debate, those construction and development of the socialist countries, China used the theory of new economic policy as a theory of reform in China. No in the reform process had many problems, I wish that through the study of the history of the struggle within output experiences and lessons learned from the history of socialist construction of China. This article is in four sections: preface, the content in four chapters and a conclusion.In the preface shows the main issues that are studied in this paper, we have a discussion on the development of the socialist countries of the twenties in the Soviet Union .V preface recited value, a plan and approach research of the topic, summarized the position on the subject of Chinese and overseas research shows , the difficult part, and upgrades.The first chapter: Domestic and foreign situation of the Soviet Union before and after the death of Lenin. These circumstances had a profound influence on Soviet Russia: Foreign position decided that the world revolution will not be, the domestic situation has forced Lenin that the NEP as a way to choose the country's development. Another important intra-state position is the inner-circumstance. V this chapter, the author drew attention to it.The second chapter: Discussion with new and old leftist oppositions and vybor . New and old left-opposition pushed some important questions about the way the country's development, including the model and the approach of industrialization, the world revolution, agricultural and farmers, inner Party democracy. Po these issues debated three times in Communist Party of the Soviet Union, in the end the Bolsheviks Communist Party of the Soviet Union won. I another route and rate of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Central Committee supported the Bolsheviks and ordinary party members mass. So you can get the result that the story chose the Bolshevik Central Committee.The third chapter: Discussion with right-wing opposition and vybor. collectivization is the introduction and provision of the commission of industrialization. The right-wing opposition, led by Bukharin had not seen the difficulties of the country did not agree with collectivization and lost. No need to understand the world in terms you can use a selection of Bukharin in socialist construction .The fourth chapter: Progress and Challenges in the Stalinist model of socialist construction . Model Stalin's socialist construction has achieved great success, but such a model, there are many problems.At the end of this article, the author thought inner struggle within 20th years . The author got two things: firstly, within the party of the proletariat is necessary to establish and develop inner-Party democracy, and secondly, the economic construction of the socialist countries need to develop an equilibrium, then there is a need to provide the level of the people, and we must ensure the security of the country's defense and force competition in the world. |