Comparative Study On Economic Effects Of Cultural Creative Industry Between China And South Korea

This paper to starting with the analysis on bud of creative economic behavior, recalling the evolution of concept of culture creative industry, on the basis of making dialectical analysis relationship between cultural creative industry and creative industry and cultural industry, more clearly defining the cultural creative industry connotation and its industry category, and pointing out that cultural creative industry once has been made, it becomes every country actively planning, focusing on supporting industry. Since the accession to the WTO, China has made rapid development on cultural creative industry; also China cultural market has made integration with global cultural market, it playing an "engine" effect in China's economic development.We could see the results at the same time. We should note that different levels of cultural creative products are variable. Compared with South Korea which cultural creative industry has been relatively developed, China cultural creative industry development is still in its infancy, it is still immature in all aspects. It can be said that cultural creative industry economic effects between China and South Korea still have a certain gap. First, in terms of trade effects, in long-standing, China cultural creative products are in a deficit state with making trade to South Korea. When comparison between two countries' geographical structure of foreign trade, it could make the conclusion that China cultural creative industry is simply stay in the country which do processing, but South Korea cultural creative industry pays more attention to their own industry development planning when it enters into oversea markets, and more focus on the technology with its own characteristics and his country's situation to develop the market. With analyzing the situation of inner trade of cultural creative industry complementarities between China and South Korea, we could see that all kinds of cultural creative products industry inner trade and the overall inner trade levels are still low in China and South Korea, even based on comparative advantage inner trade, it still has not come into been scale economies and differences in production. Second, in aspect of effects of economic growth, China and South Korea cultural creative industry both can effectively promote economic growth, whereas, from the rate of economic contribution, South Korea is higher than China. Main reason is that Chinese culture creative industry has cultivated a certain amount of cultural creative capital, but of poor quality. Third, on employment effects, this paper makes empirical analysis on employment effects of China and South Korea cultural creative industry by the employment capacity effect indicators and the employment elasticity indicators. It makes empirical analysis on China and South Korea cultural creative industry structure and relative of employment by deviation from industrial structure and relative labor productivity indicators. In aspect of employment capacity affect indicators and the employment elasticity indicators, two countries'number employment of cultural creative industry was growth overall. But China employment elasticity of cultural creative industry is not as good as South Korea. In aspect of deviation of industry structure and relative labor productivity, China relative labor productivity of cultural creative industry is lower, industry structure and employment structure is not asymmetry, while it is relatively balanced and relative labor productivity is higher in South Korea. According to the above analysis, by drawing on South Korea's cultural creative industry development experience, to develop cultural creative industry, to achieve economic stimulating effect by cultural creative industry, we should do as flowing:l.to foster innovative mechanisms to promote international trade competitiveness of cultural creative industry; 2. continue to increase investment on cultural creative industry, committed to improving the quantity and quality of cultural creative capital; 3. accelerate the modernization of cultural creative industry, give full play to its employment effects.