The Research On Marx’s Human Capital Thought And Contemporary Value

That labor was not considered in the distribution of surplus-value is the most fatal inner danger in the Capital Wage Labor System of Marx times, which caused with the exploitation of labor capital, directly led to the capitalist society economic and social crisis. Marx’s critical thinking of analysis of the irrationality capitalist system contains the obvious theoretical assumptions, this is the material capital not only confined to the capitalist financial assets, labor ability of ordinary workers (or labour) should also be seen as capital, namely human capital.In fact, rational and honest thinkers have to admit that Marx’s political economy research is conducted along two main lines. One through dominant sense capital of the capitalist system of exploitation of labor demonstration of decadent; Another through hidden meaning take advantage of the ordinary workers in human capital and demonstrate the possibility of building a harmonious society to value systems. Because cognitive bias, past Marxism theorists focused primarily on the exploitation of the labor of the dominance of capital around the main line and expand research, and more neglect under the implicit value of the main theoretical discussion. Researchers have either Marxist political economics inherent in human capital thought blind, either theory correct deep irrational dispute, stay to in Marx political economics in the introduction of the "human capital" concept, rather than objectively exposure to specific historical background of Marxist theory of political economy generated, simply look at the purpose of Marxist theory, that academic Marxist political economics has long been implicit implication of "human capital" theory assumes that a lack of proper research.Marx hiding the concept of "human capital" has two reasons, the first is for such treatment does not weaken its scientific of theory construction, in contrast, since the more prominent the theory of class character and make it has the obvious revolutionary significance; The second is due to the time background of reality at that time-human capital declined, The theoretical origins of classical political economics to reject the concept of human capital and directly into the "human capital" concept will cause conflict of the text paradigm and research target, decides that Marx could not clearly put forward the concept of human capital.Nonetheless, When examined detailed study and research Marxist political economics text by means of literature research methods and research Marxist political economy and history texts reduction method, we will find that the text of Marx’s most representative indeed contains abundant thought of human capital from Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844" to "1857-1858 Economics Manuscript","Das Kapital"to"Critique of the Gotha Program", "and others. Marx stands on the heights above the materialism, solidly abandoned the pure classical philosophy and anthropological significance of classical political economy of labor upheld, Criticism of classical economists consider labor productivity has nothing to do with the quality of labor economics, think that labor capital is essentially for the heterogeneity of distinction between capitalism and past. And creatively put forward:the complex labor associated closely with the quality of the labor force; Production of relative surplus value is hiring workers human capital level enhances unceasingly adapt to tend to be the result of the high labor productivity, Which is the conseqnence of the enhance of organic composition of capital. Is also the result of capitalist transformation of intellectual capital domination of power; Education and training is the ability to work-human capital-the formation and improve ways; The reason why people who are active and have the power to materiality, completely rooted in the practice of human labor-learning by doing; Increase to the full development of individuals from self-time, can develop the potential of people and people’s mental ability, and so on, This suggests that the concept vacancy of "human capital" in Marxist political economics gap appearance or not is not what he really refuse to abandon thoughts of human capital.Marx’s human capital has a different idea of modern Western human capital theory salient features, which are the scientific nature, class nature and human nature. He put the ordinary workers are regarded as the owner of human capital, in his view, the establish the dominant position of ordinary workers human capital reflects the historical materialism, ensure that the owners of human capital especially the vast number of ordinary workers full employment, And let them participate in the allocation of surplus value, which is the most basic requirements of institutional arrangementSince the reform and opening up, with the development of market economy, the unemployment and income inequality are coexist in China. The reform did not put ordinary workers regarded as human capital, resulting in the reform of twists and turns. The negative effects are manifest, which indicates the failure of human capital has become a common phenomenon. The reason of the phenomenon is that one of them is not for ordinary workers to make full use of human capital and the realization of value to provide the reasonable system arrangement. Therefore, we must learn from the critical thinking human capital thought of Marx and continue to promote system innovation to implement the national basic value and basic system. In order to achieve the national modern construction efforts to tamp the human capital can be fully utilized economic and institutional conditions for the realization of the value.