Study On Establishing The Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management Quality Indicatorson The Basisof Evidence-based

Objective:The study aimed at establishing sensitive, scientific, exercisabletype 2 diabetes mellitus management quality indicators on the basis of evidence-based which will help to evaluate and monitortype 2 diabetes mellitus management quality in China.Methods:Based on the rigorous retrieval strategy, using the Johns Hopkins level of evidence and quality evaluation method to analyse literatures, type 2 diabetes mellitus management quality indicators, their calculation formulas and data collection methods were summed up. Using Delphi method, according to the 5 Likert scale method, the initial formation of the importance of index entries, the rationality of the calculation formula and the operability of data collection methods were evaluated. By two rounds consultation of 36 Zhejiang experts, type 2 diabetes mellitus management quality indicators with calculation formulas and data collection methods were established, which are suitable for China’s national condition. The enthusiasm coefficient of experts, the authority coefficient of experts, the coefficients of variation and the harmonization coefficient W were used to examine the reliability and representation of expert consultation.Results:The 25 items of type 2 diabetes mellitus management quality indicators with connotation, calculation formulas, and data collection methods were established. After 2 rounds of expert consultation, the Enthusiasm Coefficient of experts was 92.50% and 97.30%(>60%). The Authority Coefficient of experts was 0.84 and 0.85(>0.7). The Coefficients of variation of the importance of all items ranged from 0.05 to 0.27, those of reasonability of calculation formulas of all items ranged from 0.06 to 0.17, those of operability to collect data of all items ranged from 0.08 to 0.20 (<0.30).Conclusions:The 25 items of type 2 diabetes mellitus management quality indicators with connotation, calculation formulas, and data collection methods were established. The reliability of the 2 rounds expert consultation showed that the expert consultations had good reliability and representation.