[Objective] The lesion of lumbar rami posterior nervorum spinalium is an important cause of nonspecific low back pain,the incidence rate showed an upward trend year after year, which receives more and more attention of clinicians. In order to find new treatment for lumbar rami posterior nervorum spinalium, This research regards the Visual analogue scale(VAS)ã€Lumbar function quantification valueã€efficacy comparison and comparison of recurrence rate as the observation index,to observe the clinical efficacy of electro-acupuncture Huatuo Jiaji points combined with O? acupoint injection in the treatment of syndrome of lumbar rami posterior nervorum spinalium,and to Analysis its mechanism of effect with a view to better guide clinical.[Methods] 68 patients who met the study criteria were selected from all patients with low back pain received by Huangshi City Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine acupuncture inpatient and outpatient department from May 2013 to May2014,and randomly divided into treatment group and control group with 34 cases in each group.The treatment group were treated with electro acupuncture on Huatuo Jiaji points combined with O? acupoint injection;the control group with electro acupuncture on Huatuo Jiaji points combined with compound angelica injection. The two groups were treated for 2 weeks and recorded before and after treatment in the visual analogue scale(VAS) score and Lumbar function quantification value,to observe the clinical therapeutic effect and score change in the two groups before and after treatment. Call return to treatment after 3months later, two groups were compared after treatment of the recurrence rate.[Results] 1ã€VAS value compare:The Comparison of VAS score between two groups before treatment had no statistical difference(P>0.05);two of their respective VAS score after treatment compared with before treatment were significantly different(P<0.05);the two groups after treatment compared to treatment group VAS score was significantly lower than the control group(P<0.01). 2ã€VAS value effect compare: the total efficiency of the treatment group was 97.1%; the markedly effective rate was 91.2%;the cure rate was 61.8%; the total efficiency of the control group was 94.1%; the markedly effective rate was 67.6%;the cure rate was38.2%.The total efficiency of two groups showed no statistical significance(P>0.05), the cure rate and the markedly effective rate of two groups were statistically significant(P<0,05). 3ã€Lumbar function quantification value compare: The Comparison of Lumbar function quantification value between two groups before treatment had no statistical difference(P>0.05);two of their respective Lumbar function quantification value after treatment ompared with before treatment were significantly different(P<0.05);the two groups after treatment compared to treatment group Lumbar function quantification value was significantly highter than the control group(P<0.01); 4ã€Lumbar function quantification value effect compare: the total efficiency of the treatment group was 97.1%; the markedly effective rate was 91.2%;the cure rate was 67.6%; the total efficiency of the control group was 94.1%; the markedly effective rate was 64.7%;the cure rate was35.3%.The total efficiency of two groups showed no statistical significance(P>0.05), the cure rate and the markedly effective rate of two groups were statistically significant(P<0,05). 5〠Comparison of two groups of patients with recurrence rate: There are 34 patients in the treatment group,among whom one relapases.The recurrence rate is 2.9%. There are 34 patients in the control group,among whom three relapases. The recurrence rate is 8.8%. The recurrence rate of two groups showed no statistical significance(P>0.05).[Conclusions] 1ã€Electro-acupuncture of Hua Tuo Jiaji points combined with ozone injection in the treatment of syndrome of lumbar rami posterior nervorum spinalium can significantly reduce the pain of patients, and improve the functional status of patients with waist.It is a safe, effective and reliable treatment method。 2ã€From the above research results,It can be obtained that the two groups after treatment than before treatment is better, Whether the efficacy of VAS analysis, or waist function curative effect analysis,which shows that the two groups of treatment are effective. However, from the cure rate and significant effective aspect, the treatment group was significantly better than the control group, which shows better therapeutic effect of the treatment group. 3ã€The recurrence rate was 2.9% in treatment group,8.8% in control group. The recurrence rate between the two groups showed no statistical significance,but under the same conditions, the number of recurrence in the treatment group were lower than those of the control group, showing that the effect of treatment group is more sustained. |