Study On The Effect Of Patients With Motor Aphasia After Stroke And Kai Tone Resuscitation Massage Method

Objective:To investigate the effect of Kai tone resuscitation Massage method on the language function of motor aphasia patients and activities of daily living after stroke, to provide a scientific and effective method for patients with a wealth of clinical nursing staff and family members of nursing stroke after stroke motor aphasia.methods:According to the disease diagnosis and the inclusion criteria, to meet the study criteria of 72 cases of motor aphasia after stroke were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, each group had 36 patients. The treatment options during the period of hospitalization treatment:In giving the premise of the same routine treatment and nursing. The control group was treated with language rehabilitation training, the experimental group of patients in the control group rehabilitation scheme based added Kai tone resuscitation Massage method.Each acupoints massage or push for 5 minutes,2 times a day; 30 minutes of language rehabilitation training each time,2 times a day; 6 days for a course of treatment, a course of treatment after 1 days of rest, lasted for 4 courses. The same goes for extension that occupy the home care services. Clinical trials before intervention, after the extension, home nursing service after using "Chinese standard aphasia examination table" (CRRCAE), Barthel index for the evaluation of language function and activities of daily living on it.Results:1 Language function(1) Two groups of patients with intervention in the first stage experiment end CRRCAE score comparison:The experimental group rehearsal, said, reading, copying, description and dictation score compared with the control group there were significant differences (P<0.01), listening comprehension, reading aloud and calculate the score compared with the control group with difference (P< 0.05).(2) Two groups of patients with intervention in the second stage experiment end CRRCAE score comparison:The experimental group in addition to calculate the score compared with the control group there is difference outside (P<0,05), listening comprehension, repeat the test group, said, reading aloud, reading, copying, description and dictation score compared with the control group there were significant differences (P< 0.01).(3) Two groups of patients in each group at different time in CRRCAE score comparison:The first stage test end the experimental group CRRCAE sub item scores before intervention compared test scores are significantly different (P<0.01); the second end the experimental group CRRCAE sub item scores compared to the end of the first phase scores were significant difference (P<0.01). The control group scores compared with the experimental group.2 Activities of daily living (ADL)(1) Two patients between group activities of daily living (ADL) score comparison:the first stage test end the experimental group ADL score compared with the control group there were significant differences (P<0.01); the end of the second stage test end of the ADL score in the experimental group compared with the control group also had significant difference (P<0.01).(2) Two groups of patients in each group at different times active ability of daily life (ADL) score comparison:the first stage of the experimental group to end the ADL score had significant difference compared to test the pre intervention scores (P<0.01); the end of the second stage ADL score compared with the first end stage also have significant difference (P<0.01). The control group scores compared with the experimental group.3 Experimental intervention efficacy(1)The comparison of the efficacy of the language function:The efficacy of the experimental group was significantly different from the control group (P<0.01).(2) The comparison of the efficacy of daily living activity (ADL):The first stage ends: The clinical effect of the experimental group was significantly different from the control group (P<0.01); The second stage ends:The home efficacy of the patients in the experimental group compared to the control group patients with differences (P<0.05).Conclusions:Added Kai tone resuscitation Massage method on rehabilitation of patients with motor aphasia patients after stroke, patient’s language function and activities of daily living ability were improved significantly and Kai tone resuscitation Massage method with language rehabilitation training is a safe and effective, economical and practical combination, it is worth popularization and application in clinical and community family.