Font Size: a A A

Clinical Analysis Of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In Aecopd Patients With Sever Type Ⅱ Respiratory Failure

Posted on:2015-12-10Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2284330434456083Subject:Respiratory medicine
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective To investigate the therapeutic value of noninvasive positivepressure ventilation(NPPV) in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructivepulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients complicated with sever typeⅡrespiratory failur(ePaCO2≥80mmHg).Methods61AECOPDpatientswith sever type Ⅱrespiratory failure (average PaCO2of these patients beforeNPPV therapy was94.79±14.24mmHg) who had received NPPV therapywere retrospectively evaluated. Respironics Vision (BiPAP) ventilatorproduced by Philips company or Savina ventilator produced by Dragercompany was used for noninvasive mechanical ventilation usingCPAP+ASB mode. Meanwhile all these patients had receivedcomprehensive treatment such as anti-infection. Clinical data such as vitalsigns and arterial blood gas analysis during the treatment were collected andevaluated. Result55patients (mean PaCO2before NPPV therapy was93.91±16.83mmHg) recovered from respiratory failure after NPPV therapy,but6patients (mean PaCO2before NPPV therapy was102.83±20.46mmHg)needed to switch to invasive mechanical ventilation. The mean PaCO2and pH value in artery blood gas analysis of all61patients were significantlyimproved through NPPV therapy(mean PaCO2before NPPV was94.79±14.24mmHg compared with64.64±16.14mmHg after NPPV, andmean pH before and after NPPV were:7.24±0.060vs.7.37±0.055,respectively, P<0.05), but PaO2and Oxygenation index were notimproved(mean PaO2before NPPV was77.80±19.91mmHg compared with82.00±17.31mmHg after NPPV, and mean Oxygenation index before andafter NPPV were:224.83±90.54mmHg vs.243.29±83.60mmHg, P>0.05).By comparing data between NPPV successful and unsuccessful group, pH7.25may be a cut-point to predict the out-come of NPPV therapy inAECOPD patients complicated with sever type Ⅱrespiratoryfailure.Conclusion NPPV is a safe and effective therapeutic method formost AECOPD patients with sever type Ⅱrespiratory failure, however forthe patient whose pH<7.25, NPPV should be utilized more cautiously andother indicator need be found to more exactly determine the indications ofNPPV.
Keywords/Search Tags:Non invasive positive pressure ventilation, AECOPD, type Ⅱrespiratory failure
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
Clinical Efficacy And Safety Analysis Of Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In Elderly AECOPD Patients With Type ? Respiratory Failure
Clinical Analysis Of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In Aecopd Patients With Sever Type Ⅱ Respiratory Failure
Analysis Of The Efficacy And Prognosis Of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In The Treatment Of AECOPD With Type ? Respiratory Failure
Clinical Observation Of High-intensity Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In The Treatment Of AECOPD Patients Complicated With Type ? Respiratory Failure
Effectiveness Of BiLevel Positive Airway Pressure Non-invasive Ventilation In AECOPD Complicated With Type Ⅱ Respiratory Failure
Comparison Of Nasal High Flow Humidified Oxygen Therapy And Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In Patients With AECOPD ? Respiratory Failure Complicated With Respiratory Muscle Fatigue
Safety And Effectiveness Of Different Inspired Oxygen Concentration In Treatment Of AECOPD Patients With Type Ⅱ Respiratory Failure Under The Condition Of Non-invasive Ventilation
Efficacy Analysis Of Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation With Different Pressures On AECOPD Combined With Type ? Respiratory Failure
Correlation Between The Efficacy Of Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation And Body Mass Index In Patients With AECOPD Combined With Type ? Respiratory Failure
10 Comparison Of The Effects Of HFNC And NIPPV In Treating AECOPD Combined With Type ? Respiratory Failure