Study On The Relevance Between The Different Diagnostic Methods Of The Auricular Points And Cervical Spondylosis

Objective: This subject use the method by inspection, palpation, electricalmeasurment method,those commomly used three kinds of the auricular point of thediagnostic method of neck discomfort in patients with auricular point observation anddiagnosis, auricular point diagnosis of correlation consistent rate comparison; study earcheckups and cervical match the rate of disease, and doctors initial diagnosis of cervicalspine imaging diagnosis, and final diagnosis were compared; study by inspection method,palpation, electrical measuring method of three common auricular point diagnosis on thedifference between the diagnosis of cervical spondylosis.In order to observe how theauricular point checkups and cervical spondylosis and whether they have an advantage andresearch ideas, rules and methods for ear checkups and cervical spondylosis.Methods: The subject using the principle of random, selected100cases of neckdiscomfort cases auricular point diagnostic methods and cervical spondylosis-relatedresearch and electrical determination of the positive points of the case with cervicaldiscomfort group points. After the end of this subject concluded by observing thefollowing:1. Three different auricular point diagnostic methods and imaging diagnosisconsistent with the number of cases and does not match the number of cases;2. Theauricular point by inspection, palpation, electrical measurement method match the numberof cases and does not match the number of cases;3. The auricular comprehensivediagnosis and cervical spine imaging diagnosis in number and don’t consistent number;4.The electrical determination of a related group of patients with cervical discomfort holepositive point frequency analysis.Results:1.By inspection method and imaging diagnosis compared the two groupshave a very significant difference (P <0.01);2.The palpation method and imaging diagnosiscompared, two groups of comparisons have very significant differences (P <0.01);3. The electrical measurement method and imaging diagnosis, there was no significant differencesbtween the two groups (P>0.05);4.By inspection and palpation wears respectively, therewas very significant difference (P <0.01);5. Inspection method and electricalmeasurement method, the two groups have a very significant difference (P<0.01);6.Palpation method and electrical measuring, where two groups have a verysignificant difference (P <0.01);7.The auricular comprehensive diagnosis and imagingdiagnosis of comparison, there was no significant differences btween the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusions:1. By inspection method, palpation, and imaging diagnosis have a verysignificant difference, electrical measurement method and imaging diagnosis of nosignificant difference, electrical measurement method by inspection method, palpation, inthe auricular point diagnosis have obvious advantages in the auricular point diagnosismethod of cervical spondylosis.2.The auricular point comprehensive diagnosis andimaging diagnosis of no significant difference between with them,the auricular pointcomprehensive diagnosis for auricular point diagnosis of cervical spondylosis is acomprehensive, accurate diagnostic methods, and single auricular point comprehensivediagnosis by inspection method, palpation, electrical measurement has an obviousadvantage.3.In the process of the auricular point electrical measurement, jǐngzhuī(AH13),zh ě n(AT3), ji ā n(SF4,5), sh é nm é n(TF4), ji ā og ǎ n(AH6a), g ā n(CO12), sh è n(CO10),x īn(CO15),pí(CO13), pízhìxià(AT4), nèifēnmì(CO18), chuíqían(LO4) have the high relativerate with Cervical Spondylosis,in more than50cases, the frequency higher than more;jǐng(AH12)zhǒu(SF3), wàn(SF2), zhǐ(SF1), wèi(CO4) have the low relative rate with CervicalSpondylosis, in less than50cases, the frequency is relatively small.