Supine Fixed-point Pull Method Of Treatment The Clinical Effect Of The Treatment Of Cervical Spondylosis Of Nerve Root Type

Background:This experiment mainly USES the supine fixed-point pull treatment method on cervical spondylosis of nerve root type, our director is good at using ChenShiYu supine fixed-point pull treatment method, the clinic patients many, are satisfactory curative effect, many of which patients are from word of mouth. In order to verify the effectiveness of the science and technique, design the subject.Methods:Select in Beijing university of Chinese medicine third affiliated hospital bone out-patient clinic hospital and1patients, will meet nerve root root cervical vertebrasickness diagnosis standard and to agree to the study of100patients with, according to random digital packet method divided into the treatment group and control group, each group of each50cases, the treatment group using supine fixed-point pull treatment method, the computer control traction method treatment, the treatment group weekly therapy1,2times a treatment for treatment; Every day20min traction control, traction2weeks for a period of treatment, treatment after a period of treatment efficacy evaluation, and in one week after four weeks, after eight weeks, telephone follow-up recurrence. Two groups before and after treatment with neck pain are arm visual simulation score (VAS), cervical vertebra mobility integral, Japan TianZhongJing long20points method, the recurrence rate as a clinical observation index. Statistical software SPSS17.0package will score results data process ing.The results:1, neck arm pain visual analog scale (VAS):The treatment group: before treatment for:4.1923±1.4422; For0.58±1.0708after treatment, P<0001; the control group:before treatment for4.5556±1.2539, after treatment for2.04±1.3087.2, cervical vertebra mobility points:The treatment group:before treatment for:3.36±2.9469; For0.48±1.1111after treatment, P <0001; the control group:before treatment for4.02±2.3946, after treatment for1.62±1.73662.3, Japan TianZhongJing long20points law:The treatment group:before treatment for9±4.7724,19.58±1.1082after treatment; the control group:before treatment for6.5±4.432, after treatment for15.62±2.6718P<0001.4, the total effect assessment:The treatment group:15cases were cured, accounted for30.00%; Powerfully20patients (40.00%; Effective in13,20.00%; Invalid in2cases, accounting for4.00%, the total effective rate96.00%; The control group:cure2cases,4.08%;10cases were markedly improved, accounted for20.40%; Effective28patients (57.14%;9cases failed, with18.36%, the total effective rate of81.63%, P<0.05.5, The recurrence rate:the treatment group in50patients,1with recurrence, and the recurrence rate is2.00%; the control group in49cases,8cases of recurrence, and the recurrence rate is16.32%, P <0.05, two groups values have obvious difference.Conclusion:Supine fixed-point pull method and the computer for traction on cervical spondylosis of nerve root type JianBei pain in the neck, cervical vertebra mobility, overall improvement has good curative effect, but the supine position designated pull method is better than the computer traction, and relapse not easily after t rea tment.