Effects Of Different Swimming Training Programs

OBJECTIVE:Though observing the arrangement of two groups of swimmers’ training plans to research their influence on training effects.METHODS:The subjects were two groups of swimming athletes, Group A and Group B. Every group had6athletes,1trainer and1training plan. Observe and record their3weeks of training plans.50m,100m,200m and5X200m increasing load tests were examined before and after the training. Swimming duration and Bla after every test were recorded. Hb, WBC and BU of every one were examined on every Monday of3training weeks and after training. Testosterone wore examined on Monday of the first and the forth weeks. The two training plans, tests results, and Hb, WBC, BU, T were analyzed.RESULTS:1The training volume per week of group A increased, and the average of weekly training volume was48540m excepting REC. Aerobic training and anaerobic training was87.1%and12.9%. Training intensity was almost focused on REC, EN1and EN2, involving little EN3and SP3, and no SP1and SP2.2The swimming duration of group A in50m,100m,200in and5×200m increasing load tests before and after training had little changes with no significant differences; while Bla decreased, with significant, differences.3Hb of group A continuously decreased by13%; BU rose early and dropped later which was always in the normal range; WBC dropped early and rose later which was always in the normal range; Testosterone reduced by12.4%in male and36.7%in female. 4The training volume per/week of group B increased, and the average of weekly training volume was35200m excepting REC. Aerobic training and anaerobic training was91.4%and8.6%. Training intensity was almost focused on REC, EN1and EN2, involving little EN3, SPland SP3, and no SP2.5The swimming duration of group B in50m,100m,200m and5×200m increasing load tests before and after training had little change, with no significant differences; Bla decreased, with no significant differences except Bla after100m and200m tests.6The Hb of group B rose early and dropped later; the BU continuously increased in small range; the WBC dropped early and rose later, which was always in the normal range; the Testosterone reduced little.CONCLUSIONS:1The main purpose of group A is to train athlete aerobic capacity. After three weeks of training, the changes of athletes’ anaerobic capacity were few, while the aerobic capacity improved great. Through the physiological and biochemical examination found that Hb and T dropped too lot. Consequently, training volume,48540m per week, was too big for athletes in group A.2The main purpose of group B is to train athlete aerobic capacity. After three weeks of training, the changes of athletes’ anaerobic capacity were few, while the aerobic capacity had a small increase. Through the physiological and biochemical examination found that Hb, WBC, BU and T changed rarely. Consequently, training volume,35200m per week, was too small for athletes in group B.