Clinical Research Of Different Acupuncture Treatment On Tennis Elbow

Objective:The subject is expect to based on the previous theory and experience, to research the the efficacy and differences of the different acupuncture treatment on tennis elbow.Methods:Collect80cases of insomnia, which are met the inclusion criteria, stratified mild, moderate, severe in3layers, divided random into4groups,①acupuncture with warmed needle+massage group、②Contralateral Needling+local venesection group、③cupuncture with warmed group、④mssage group。20cases in each group.Interventions:①acupuncture with warmed needle+massage group:diseased side acupoints:zhongzhu (SJ3), Hegu (LI4), houxi (SI3), Ah Shih point is the main point, supplement point are qu chi(LI11), Shousanli (LI10), Lieque (LU7) After the above pointsdeveloping needle sensation, warm the needle, finally, gave massage。②group:Needle sensitive points around Yanglingquan (GB34) in contralateral side, After the above pointsdeveloping needle sensation, retaining needle15min, withdrawal the needles, find the most sensitive point of tenderness in diseased side, prick by sterile needle, squeeze a few drops of blood.③group:diseased side acupoints:zhongzhu (SJ3), Hegu (LI4), houxi(SI3), Ah Shih point is the main point, supplement point are qu chi(LIll), Shousanli (LI10), Lieque (LU7). After the above pointsdeveloping needle sensation, warm the needle.④group。 massage diseased side only. All therapeutic treatment were given every other day, Rest for a week after the end of the first course, second course of treatment. A total of2courses of treatment.Results:(1)8cases dropped out of80patients,2cases in each group,18cases in each group.(2) after treatment, the clinical symptom integrals of each group had significantly reduced, the treatment effect were obvious. And group①、②group were beter than group③、④。(3) The efficiency of each group was94.44%,94.44%,83.33%,61.11%, group①、②group were beter than group③、④。(4) The VAS of each group had significantly reduced, and group①、②group were beter than group③、④。(5) The McGill of each group had significantly reduced, and group①、②group were beter than group③、④Conclusion:(1) the clinical symptom integrals of each group had significantly reduced.(6)(2) curative effect of group①、②group were beter than group③、④。...