The Clinical Study Of Regulating The Spirit With Acupuncture On The Insomnia

ObjectiveThe study will observe the effect of acupuncture with the method of reg ulating the spirit,compared to the common method with acupuncture,further more,contract the characteristics and the differences between the two met hods,and explore the mechanism of the better one.MethodsIn this trial,the62patients who meet the standards,are randomly assig ned to the two groups,one is the treatment group,including31patients,us ing the method of regulating the spirit,the other one is the control grou p, also including31patients, using the method of the common method.the p oints in treatment group are:sishencong(EX-HN1),shenting(GV24),yintang(EX-HN3),neiguan(P6),san yinjiao(SP6),tianshu(S25),zhognwan(CV12),guanyuan(C V4).the points in the control group are:yintang(EX-HN3),sishencong(EX-HN1),anmian(EX1),shenmen(H7),zhaohai(K6),shenmai(BL-62),the minor points ar e:xingjian(L2) and xiaxi(GB43),corresponding to liver fire harassing th e heart type,fenglong(S40) and neiting(ST44),corresponding to internal d isturbance of pyrophlegm and fire type,xinshu(BL15) and pishu(BL20),corre sponding to the weakness of heart and spleen,xinshu(BL15) and shenshu(BL23),corresponding to the incoherence of heart and kidney type,xinshu(BL15) and danshu(BL19),corresponding to deficiency of heart-qi and gallbladder-qi type.score will be counted by using the five scales,including SPIEG EL, Athens,PSQI,SDA,SAS scale before and after the treatment to judge the clinical efficacy.ResultsThe score of the5scales in two groups are all lowered after the treatment,and the comparisons of total score have significant differences(P<0.05). the comparisons of each item of PSQI of the two groups have significant differences(P<0.01). The treatment group is better than those of control group at the aspects of sleep quality,daytime function and sleep disorder(P<0.05).There is no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups,while there is significant difference in the recovery and the effectual rate(P<0.05).ConclusionThe two methods all have clinical treatment effect,and have no difference in total treatment effect,but the rate of recovery and effectual rate are better than the control group.the overall evaluations of the two groups have no apparent difference,while the treantment group is better than the control group on sleep quality,daytime function and sleep disorder.