Clinical Observation Of Soothing Liver-qi And Regulating The Spirit Acupuncture Method Combined With Da Zhui Pricking And Cupping Therapy In Treating Acne

Objective: to observe the effect of soothing liver-qi and regulating the spirit acupuncture method combined with Da Zhui pricking and cupping therapy in the treatment of Acne,compared with the general acupuncture method,and to explore the advantages of soothing liver-qi and regulating the spirit acupuncture method in the treatment of acne,and to provide a more effective treatment for acne patients.Methods: 72 patients were randomly divided into treatment group(n = 36)and control group(n = 36).The treatment group was given soothing liver-qi and regulating the spirit acupuncture method combined with Da Zhui pricking and cupping therapy,the control group was given general acupuncture method combined with Da Zhui pricking and cupping therapy.6 times a week,2 weeks a course,The two grroups were treated 2 courses.The effect of the two groups was evaluated by observing the comprehensive grading system score of acne(GAGS)and the specific quality of life scale of facial acne(Qol-Acne).Result: 1.A total of 33 effective cases were included in the treatment group,the total effective rate was 87.88%.A total of 32 effective cases were included in the control group,the total effective rate was75.00%.The data of the two groups were tested by rank sum,and Z=-2.410,P=0.016<0.05.There was a statistically significant difference in effect among the two groups,which indicated that soothing liver-qi and regulating the spirit acupuncture method combined with Da Zhui pricking and cupping therapy was more effective.2.The GAGS scores of the treatment group before and after treatment were24.00(18.00,30.00)and 6.00(0.00,9.00)respectively.The data was tested by t test,and t=17.707,P = 0.000 < 0.05,the difference was statistically significant.The GAGS scores of the control group before and after treatment were 24.00(18.50,29.50)and 8.00(4.50,14.00) respectively.The data was tested by rank sum,and Z=-4.969,P =0.000<0.05,indicating that the difference was statistically significant.The comparison between two groups explain that P=0.040<0.05,there was a statistically significant difference.3.The Qol-Acne scores of the treatment group before and after treatment were 46.88 ±7.56 and 66.88 ±7.88 respectively.The data was tested by t test,and t=-16.403,P = 0.000 < 0.05,the difference was statistically significant.The Qol-Acne score of the control group before and after treatment was 45.81 ±8.50 and 58.41 ±7.08 respectively,The data was tested by rank sum,and Z=-4.950,P = 0.000 < 0.05.The difference was statistically significant.The comparison between two groups explain that P=0.000<0.05,there was a statistically significant difference.Conclusion: By comparing the GAGS scores and Qol-Acne scores before and after the treatment of the two groups,both of the two methods can improve the skin lesions and life state of the patients.Compared with the control group,the treatment group has better effect in improving the skin lesion state and improving the quality of life of the patients,and the overall curative effect is better.