Research On Upgrading Benchmarking Management Of F Power Supply Companie

In the face of the new international and domestic situations such as the reform of the power system,the reform of state-owned assets and enterprises,the energy revolution,and the new crown epidemic,State Grid Corporation strategically formulated the strategic goal of building a "internationally leading energy Internet enterprise with Chinese characteristics" in early 2020.State Grid’s peer-to-peer benchmarking work began at the beginning of the 21 st century.The company established a three-dimensional peer-to-peer benchmarking management system of "province-prefecture-county",and implemented benchmarking management from top to bottom.With the deepening of the benchmarking system,the business process of the enterprise is gradually standardized,and various indexes of the enterprise are constantly updated.Benchmarking has become an important method for various majors and units to compare and surpass advanced benchmarks in the power industry at home and abroad,and to improve the comprehensive strength of enterprises.As an important member of the benchmarking system,the prefecture-level power supply enterprises are connected to the provincial power company and the county-level power supply company.The role of the prefecture-level power supply enterprises in the benchmarking work has become increasingly prominent.Especially after the company’s organizational system has undergone the "three sets and five five" reforms,the peer benchmarking work has gradually become a measuring instrument for the management level of prefecture-level power supply enterprises.However,the current internal benchmarking of the State Grid Corporation mainly adopts the overall benchmarking method.The power supply companies in various cities and regions do not take advantage of the benchmarking management of the same industry,and use the PDCA Deming Ring to establish an inspection and improvement mechanism of repeated inspection and repeated improvement.On this basis,there is no systematic organization to carry out special promotion with strong pertinence and clear purpose.This requires further special analysis and improvement plans for the problems found in the benchmarking management of power supply companies,so as to better play the role of benchmarking management,closely follow the management practice,accurately analyze the nature of the problem,clarify the main direction of attack,and gather resources.Strength,make up for the shortcomings of management,and promote the sustainable development of power supply enterprises.This paper takes F power supply company as the research object,through continuous comparison with benchmark indicators,according to the "PDCA" cycle logic,to find out the reasons for the gaps,formulate measures,and improve in time,so that the level of indicator management can be continuously improved and the maximum benefit can be achieved.change.This paper first introduces the research background and significance of peer benchmarking management,and then uses the literature research method to investigate and understand the development process of peer benchmarking management at home and abroad.On the theoretical basis,according to the PDCA cycle management method,the current status of the peer benchmarking management of F power supply company is analyzed.By checking the account records of Company F,using the comparative analysis method,starting from the performance benchmarking and management benchmarking,the power supply company F and the benchmarking enterprises are compared and analyzed,and based on the calculation of weights,the benchmarking of peers is divided into modules.The 14 modules of the management system have identified various key indicators;through the research on the four stages of the F company’s P plan stage,D execution stage,C inspection stage,and A processing stage,this paper analyzes and summarizes the existence of F company in these four stages.The problem.Based on the above-mentioned problems,this paper uses the 4M1 E analysis method to conduct an in-depth analysis of the causes of the problems.Through the weight calculation,it sorts the causes of the backwardness of the peer-to-peer benchmarking management of Company F,and finds out several key factors that affect the management,so as to carry out targeted improvement.And finally form a Deming cycle of repeated error checking and promotion.Finally,we sort out and summarize the benchmarking improvement measures and safeguard measures of F power supply company,which will help F power supply company to further clarify the focus of the next step,so that the improvement measures and safeguard measures are more comparable and operable,and it is a good source for the power industry.Many power supply enterprise peer benchmarking management workers have provided knowledge and reference for improvement.