| This paper compares China’s General High School Language Curriculum Standards(2017Edition Revised 2020)with Myanmar’s National Common Core Standards for Myanmar Language Arts and Literacy,English Language,History and Society,Science and Technology Subjects,Ethics and Citizenship,and Physical Education and Fine Arts in the process of research,focusing on the differences between the high school language curriculum standards of China and Myanmar,mainly analyzing the following Several aspects: one is the design concept,two is the content of the curriculum,three is the nature of the curriculum,four is the characteristics of the curriculum,and five is the framework of the curriculum,and then the differences between the above five aspects are analyzed based on different dimensions,hoping to have a cross-reference value.This paper has two main parts as follows: one is the main text,and the other is the introduction.In the introductory part of this paper,the focus of the study is on six points.The following is a comparative study of the high school language curriculum standards in China and Myanmar in five aspects: First,by analyzing the curriculum standards in depth,it can provide guidance for educational work.Secondly,our country has certain advantages in education and education,so it can be used as a reference for other countries.But Myanmar curriculum standards writing and design also have some reference value for our country.Once again,China’s Chinese General High School Language Curriculum Standards(2017 Edition Revised 2020)have similarities and differences with the National Common Core Standards for Myanmar Language Arts and Literacy,English Language,History and Society,Science and Technology Subjects,Ethics and Citizenship,Physical Education and Fine Arts promulgated in China,so the concept of writing Chinese curriculum standards can be borrowed to enrich our curriculum standards.The fourth and fifth are the main content of this paper’s research,focusing on several aspects of the high school language curriculum standards in China and Myanmar as follows: first,listening and communicating,second,assisting,and third,reading.From the perspective of reading in the curriculum standards,the article focuses on the design features and concepts of the reading aspects of the Chinese and Myanmar high school language curriculum standards,and then compares the content of the curriculum standards about reading teaching in China and Myanmar to find out the similarities and differences.Both pay more attention to the differences in student perception,reading thinking,interactive learning,text interpretation,and reading value orientation;for the writing standards,this paper focuses on comparing the differences in the design concepts of writing in the high school language standards of China and Myanmar,and then in the process of specific research,mainly from the following aspects:first,the writing process,second,the writing topic,and third,the purpose of writing.At the same time,both pursue the integrity and creativity of students’ writing process,the enhancement of knowledge and ability,and the integration of life,but also due to a variety of reasons,there are differences in the main line of writing design and development goals;for the listening and communicating standards,this paper elaborates on the similarities and differences between the listening and communicating standards of high school language standards in China and Myanmar,relating to the comparison of the following aspects: first,the communicative ontology,second,the communicative process,and third,the communicative subject.The similarities and differences between the curriculum standards of the two countries are as follows: one is to unify listening,speaking,reading and writing,the other is for better application of the subject,and the third is to promote students’ all-round development;the differences between the curriculum standards are as follows: one is to cultivate different purposes,the other is to pay attention to different perspectives,and the third is to pursue different goals. |