Research On Non Litigation Resolution Of Disputes Over Performance Brokerage Contract

In practice,after conflicts between artists and performing arts brokerage companies,due to the lack of effective communication and dialogue mechanisms,many artists and companies have resorted to public opinion attacks,snow storage,and blockades to sanction each other,exacerbating into greater conflicts,resulting in increased losses for both parties,and seeking judicial solutions.Artists and performing arts brokerage companies originally share a common interest pursuit,and a single settlement of disputes through litigation will inevitably affect the realization of both parties’ interests.Artists sign performance brokerage contracts in the hope of achieving greater professional development and popularity,in order to improve their skills and realize their interests.Performance brokerage companies also hope to obtain higher brokerage fees by transforming the potential market value of artists into available benefits.Performance brokerage companies and artists can be described as a community of interests,and the most important way to resolve disputes between them should be to rebalance the unbalanced benefits distribution and management model and other contract terms.After a dispute occurs,if both parties can communicate openly,avoid using adversarial methods to counter the other party,and maintain a rational and friendly attitude,not only can the losses of both parties be minimized as much as possible,but also can achieve a certain degree of benefits.Therefore,this article proposes that it should be recognized that the relationship between artists and performing arts brokerage companies is not a zero-sum game.Both parties can create a third path in the context of non litigation,pursue the maximization of their common interests,and restore the trust base,thereby avoiding various adverse effects of litigation on both parties.