Research On The Pluralistic Settlement Mechanism Of Administrative Disputes

At the Central Committee of the Central Committee in November 2020,General Secretary Xi emphasized that it was necessary to improve the comprehensive mechanism of resolving the resolution of multiple prevention and disputes in social contradictions and disputes.Under the unified deployment of the central government,in recent years,all parts of the country have been continuously promoting various diversified solution work.Administrative disputes are one of the main social contradictions.How to solve administrative disputes efficiently,how to better improve the diversified solution mechanism,and reduce administrative disputes from the root is an important part of building a harmonious society.At present,the research on the academic community on the solution of administrative disputes is relatively concentrated.It mainly has research on administrative reconsideration,administrative litigation,and mediation,etc.,and also has research on solving channels and diversification of systematic construction.From different angles and different levels,these studies have conducted an in-depth analysis of administrative dispute resolution mechanisms at the theoretical level,methodology,and practical level,and laid the foundation for the development of this article.Y County,as a county in southern Zhejiang,has a certain universal representativeness in all aspects of economy and population.The county’s administrative dispute diversification solution mechanism has some remoted highlights,and there are typical problems in southern Zhejiang.The author chose the county as an example to show the highlight work and study typical issues,trying to provide reference suggestions for the diversified solution mechanism of administrative disputes in other regions.This article uses literature research methods,comparative analysis methods,and field survey laws to conduct research,using network resources to inquire about research results in the domestic and foreign administrative dispute solutions,compare the differences and pros and cons of administrative reconsideration,administrative lawsuits,mediation and other solutions.And through visits,the data of administrative reconsideration and administrative lawsuits in the past three years have been obtained.The analysis has sorted out four aspects of problems,which are the main functions of administrative reconsideration.Administrative organs are not highly administrative according to law,and the ability of administrative organs to resolve disputes is not strong.Combined with the basic concept of "the source prevention as the first,non-appeal mechanism,and the end of the court’s referee",based on the actual situation of the county,five major suggestions,are put forward: to build a basic foundation for the social rule of law and further promote the governance of the source of the complaint source.To play the main role of administrative reconsideration,further strengthen the role of "big mediation",and further improve the connection between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation.It is hoped that through this analysis and research,you can provide further measures and reference for the local county party committee and county governments,and can also provide experience for other places with similar problems;I hope that this article will help alleviate the existence of public management between the masses and the government because of public management.Contradiction helps to promote social contradictions and innovation and social harmony and stability.