Research On The Recognition Standards Of The Marital Joint Debt

When the civil law came into force,Section 1064 on household debt in principle contained so-called false declarations of debt(2018).But many of the earliest questions to explain extramarital sin in 2018 have also been forgotten.In fact,many cases show that when the burdens of daily life are divided between two couples and each person’s "stress" is not consistent,practical difficulties are often encountered.While the international code on marriage and the family further complements the recognition of marital debt,it also indicates that the practice of case law faces different choices in the same context.The authors of this survey provide a response to this question and subtly explain the differences in the methods of civil court trials in the past.In this paper,the criterion of recognition of joint debtors based on commitment mainly involves the definition of non-debtors’ rights.This assessment is based on the identity of the borrower.If the borrower has expressed their intention,then they are responsible as a co-debtor or guarantor.In addition,the meeting also discussed AD hoc loan allocation methods,the scope of borrowers to expand at will is greatly limited.Definitions relating to the "daily needs of households" are also explored,the most important being "the amount of government debt" and "the use of creditors ".This outcome should not be assessed solely on the basis of harmonised national debt criteria,but should also be able to take into account many factors such as couples’ income and level of consumption.The transactions between the spouses concern products and business and determine the continuity of the economic relationship between the spouses.This article argues that the provisions of the Civil Code actually sacrifice the rights and interests of creditors,with a focus on protecting the interests of non debtor parties of the couple.This is because the Civil Code provides for fewer types of marital debt and still restricts the interpretation of provisions,so the protection of creditors and non debtor parties by law is not equal.The burden of proof for the proof of marital agreement should be borne by the creditor,as the creditor has a duty of care for the joint debt claimed by the couple.Although countries apply the same rules of judicial interpretation of civil law and relevant institutions,the recognition of couples’ collective debt in common debt disputes remains a difficult task.This paper therefore provides an in-depth study of this approach to law enforcement.To assist the judiciary,it is necessary to criticize the difficulties and inadequacies of legal recognition arising from the disputes between the two parties and to adequately resolve the difficulties and problems facing the couple.