With the gradual improvement of the value of data resources,countries pay more attention to the security of data resources.The report of the Party’s 20 th National Congress clearly pointed out that it is necessary to speed up the construction of a network power and a digital China,and attach importance to data security and application.The public security data opening work is the key work to promote the smart public security in the new era.However,the current lack of targeted legal protection of public security data opening,coupled with the limited means of public security organs to assess the risk of public security data opening,it is difficult to form an effective evaluation.The "Data Security Law" issued in 2021 makes clear provisions for the openness and security of government data,requiring a sound data security management system.In this context,the risk and management countermeasures of public security data opening are studied,and the current situation of public security data opening risk is analyzed with reference to the data life cycle management theory.Policy analysis and interview methods are used to extract risk factor indicators,and information security risk assessment theory is introduced to build a risk assessment index system for public security data opening up,evaluate the risk indicators for public security data opening up,and propose management paths to deal with the risk of data opening up.It is of great significance to optimize the risk management measures of public security data opening,improve the level of public security data opening,and play the role of public security data.Through the assessment of the risk of public security data opening,this study finds that:(1)the overall risk of public security data opening is at a relatively high level,and targeted management measures should be taken to improve the protection ability and promote the development of public security data opening.(2)Among the first-level indicators,the impact of national security risks on the open work of public security data is greater than the impact of the two risks of data vulnerability and potential threats.Therefore,to promote the steady progress of the open work of public security data,it is necessary to focus on the level of national security.(3)In the secondary indicators,the impact of legal risk is much greater than that of use risk,data risk,management risk,technical risk and ethical risk.Therefore,the state should focus on the management of public security data opening from the legal aspect,while taking into account other risks to avoid risk deterioration.Based on the above research results and the actual situation of public security data opening,in order to improve the efficiency of public security data opening,this study puts forward corresponding policy suggestions according to different risk sources: First,in view of legal risks,formulate special laws and regulations for public security data management,including classification protection system and privacy protection provisions,so as to make up for the loopholes in public security data opening regulations.Second,in view of the risk of use,formulate norms for the open use of public security data,and clarify the scope and use authority of public security data opening,so as to improve the standardization of open use of data.Third,in view of data risks,formulate public security data collection standards to improve the quality of public security data.Fourth,in view of management risks,optimize the setting of public security data open management departments,build feedback mechanisms for the use of mass data,improve management levels,and effectively serve the needs of the masses.Fifth,in view of technical risks,improve the construction of public security data open platform and public security database,and refine the public security data open platform and database management system.Sixth,in view of ethical risks,clarify the security obligations of public security data controllers,clarify the protection responsibilities of third-party institutions,and cultivate the awareness of public security data ethics. |