On The Publicity Of Administrative Penalty Decision

With the popularization of the concept of transparent government,the issue of government information disclosure has been put on the agenda,among which whether the information disclosure decided by administrative penalties has been established as a clear system has aroused heated discussion.At present,the disclosure of administrative penalty decisions has been applied in practice,which has a certain positive significance and has achieved certain results in supervising the government and protecting citizens’ right to know and safeguarding the public interest.However,in contrast,there are also some problems,which still need to be improved in terms of balancing the right to know and privacy,different public consequences,and procedural application.Under the revision of the Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on the Disclosure of Government Information and the Administrative Punishment Law,the system of disclosure of administrative penalty decisions is discussed again.At present,most academics are supportive of the disclosure of administrative penalty decisions,believing that the advantages of disclosure outweigh the disadvantages.It has a positive effect on the management function of the government and the public interest,but this article believes that comprehensive disclosure does not have absolute positive significance.In the absence of a perfect supporting system,the comprehensive disclosure of information in the process of administrative punishment may have an impact on the existing social order.And in the case of public decision,corresponding remedial measures should be made,such as relief channels,administrative compensation and other measures.Therefore,this paper believes that in the face of the current actual situation,the disclosure of administrative penalty decisions is necessary,but the scope and limit of its disclosure are debatable,and consultation and cooperation between horizontal and vertical administrative organs are needed.