On The Application Of AI Judges

The leap development of artificial intelligence and big data technology has brought great changes to social life.All sectors of society have joined the revolutionary wave of exploring "AI +",which has also caused different voices of the public,and the judicial field is no exception.The combination of "AI + law" brings unprecedented efficiency value to the judicial field,But it also faces potential risks and challenges,The application of legal artificial intelligence products to accelerate the process of the construction of smart courts in China,It also marks the great development of the construction of judicial informatization,As the AI judge’s latest manifestation of legal artificial intelligence products,The state invested substantial financial,manpower and technical support,Compared with traditional legal AI products,there are particularity,First of all,the overall degree of AI judges is more intelligent,At the technical level and at the professional level of legal application practice,Secondly,it presents the characteristics of physique and visualization externally,Having a visual image similar to a human being,Moreover,in terms of social influence,Compared to the past,Its advent and application have a more prominent impact on the society.The particularity of AI judges and their own advantages should have great potential in judicial practice,but the emergence of AI judges does not have an ideal effect at the practical level.The active promotion of official and academic research contrasts with the limited application effect of judicial practice,and a positive relationship between the two has not been achieved.In order to improve the practical application rate of AI judges,give full play to the advantages of legal artificial intelligence in judicial work,and realize the benign interaction and coordination between AI judges and human judges,it is necessary to think about the improvement of the current situation and future development prospects of AI judges.First of all,the advent of the AI judge has impacted the traditional litigation concept,This shock is reflected in the "algorithm black box" behind the AI judges that violates the principles of openness and justice,To regulate the application of AI judges,Need to analyze the role and positioning of AI judges in practice,Secondly,the specific application scope of AI judges is clarified,To provide concrete guidance to the application of judicial practice,Moreover,the objective advantage of AI judges themselves is conducive to ensuring the unity of judicial judgment,But overemphasizing such unity would conflict with the discretion of the judge,It should therefore be flexible to balance the relationship between the AI judge’s application and the judge’s discretion on the issue.Through the literature analysis method and the comparative research method to improve the application of AI judges,Current and for the long future,AI judges shall be positioned as auxiliary tools for human judges,Play an supporting role,Whether the parties and judges have the option and decide whether such auxiliary efficacy is definitely applied,AI judges in justice is still in its infancy,The substantive areas of judicial decisions have not yet been touched in the scope of application,When both judicial data and algorithm technology develop to a certain stage,To develop an suitable AI judge operation system,On the basis of retaining the original auxiliary function,An attempt to refer the substantive decision-making authority in some simple cases to the AI judge,Thus,it can better relieve the pressure of more cases and fewer people.At the same time,the application scope of AI judges should be scientifically defined,and the application scope of AI judges should be scientifically determined from the current and future perspectives...