Reconstruction Of ’Circulating A Notice Of Criticism’ System From The Perspective Of Information Society

At the present stage,most of the ’circulating a notice of criticism’ occur in the nature of internal administrative behavior or industry self-discipline.Even as an administrative penalty,it still has internal characteristics.Compared with other reputation penalties,it is not widely used in some fields that support the basic order of society.The reason for this situation lies in the fact that its system originated from the acquaintance society and traditional unit system.Due to the small population flow in the acquaintance society,people are extremely face-loving and have strong barriers in the industry,the scope of negative information dissemination is fixed and the consequences are controllable,and notification and criticism work well.However,in the social context of the gradual collapse of the unit system and the transition from an acquaintance society to a stranger society,unit mobility has increased,industry barriers have been broken,and the rapid spread of information cannot be controlled.At the same time,there is an urgent need for severe reputation penalties to compensate for traditional penalties such as property penalties.At this time,it is necessary to break away from the traditional unit system and introduce the perspective of the information society to reexamine the ’circulating a notice of criticism’.Due to the shift from relay oral communication to simultaneous awareness in the perspective of the information society,attention must be paid to the first transmission of information.The social environment of information explosion requires that information dissemination must gather popularity.The background of stranger society has also changed the emphasis on reputation from being taken for granted to measuring benefits.Therefore,the role of ’circulating a notice of criticism’ needs to be brought into play under the new conditions of an efficient and efficient information transmission system,the possibility of the public’s enthusiasm for punishment,and the relative person’s attention to reputation.For enterprises,the possibility of punishment’ element requires no monopoly,and the’self emphasis on reputation’ element requires the existence of repeated games.In the new context of the information society,’circulating a notice of criticism’ has new opportunities to enhance the effectiveness of punishment and prevention,and reduce the cost of punishment.But there are also some new challenges.In the information society,’circulating a notice of criticism’ may not be well disseminated,but may also lead to overreaction and increased uncertainty.Once there is excess negative information,the emergence of a trust crisis will lead to adverse consequences such as weakening adverse selection reactions,and increasing the risk of reputation mechanism failure.Once there is an error in the punishment,the government is unable to revoke all the subsequent secondary dissemination of information.And restoring trust is inherently more difficult than damaging trust,making it more difficult to repair the government’s reputation.Based on this,in the information society,it is necessary for adaptive modification of the’circulating a notice of criticism’.In the scope of application,it should exclude minor violations and applications involving core reputation,and be mainly applicable to entities such as enterprises and public figures,as well as areas with asymmetric information but directly related to the safety of citizens’ personal and property.In terms of publicity methods,considering the effective dissemination of information,it is possible to establish a rapid and efficient information transmission system by establishing a unified ’circulating a notice of criticism’ publicity system,publicizing on public dependent communication paths,and targeted dissemination of specific information.In terms of control,attention should be paid to pre and in-process control,including granting the opposite party the right to apply for a hearing,strictly applying the legal review and collective discussion system,applying the litigation suspension system based on interest measurement,and constructing preventive administrative litigation.When meeting the elements of probability and significant damage,the opposing party is allowed to file a preventive omission lawsuit before the administrative action is about to be taken.