| The number of regulatory bodies in the municipal government with districts is large,and they play a prominent role in local administrative management activities in China.They are an important component of China’s administrative and legislative systems.In 2023,the Legislative Law was amended to increase the regulatory authority of the municipal government with districts,and to add "grassroots governance" matters.This is a significant progress and also indirectly indicates that the regulatory authority of the municipal government with districts in the past has to some extent been unable to meet the needs of social governance.Therefore,starting from the regulatory authority of the municipal government with districts,on the one hand,by analyzing legal texts such as the Constitution and the Legislative Law,and on the other hand,using the regulations of 16 municipal governments with districts in Shandong Province as research samples,this study analyzes the actual operation and existing problems of the regulatory authority of the municipal government with districts in the process of rulemaking,in order to have a better understanding and grasp of the regulatory authority of the municipal government with districts.After two aspects of analysis,it can be found that the regulatory power of the municipal government with districts still has issues such as unclear scope of authority,insufficient standardization of public participation and filing review procedures,and untimely follow-up of legislation,reform,and abolishment work.Finally,based on the identified issues,targeted suggestions are proposed to reasonably explain the regulatory authority of the municipal government in the district through the method of purposive expansion interpretation,and on this basis,clarify the division of regulatory authority between the municipal government in the district,local regulations,and provincial government regulations.In terms of procedures,it is recommended to improve the temporary government regulations and filing review mechanism by standardizing the formulation process,and use the post legislation evaluation mechanism to promote the revision and abolishment of regulations,accelerate the practical transformation of evaluation results,achieve scientific legislation,and improve China’s legislative system. |