| The civil self-admission system fully respects the parties’ right to disposition,conforms to the principle of autonomy of will,and plays a role in simplifying contention and improving litigation efficiency.With the development of judicial practice,China’s civil self-admission system has highlighted in theory and practice the imperfect system of fictional self-admission,the adjudication rules of limited self-admission are not uniform,the lack of effective regulation of false self-admission,and the need to improve the self-admission revocation system.This paper adopts literature research and comparative analysis.By comparing the self-admission systems of civil law and common law systems,suggestions for improvement are put forward from three aspects:legislation,judiciary and supporting systems.In terms of legislation,China should regulate the effectiveness of self-admission on courts,clarify the inter-litigation and inter-trial effects of self-admission,improve the limited self-admission and self-admission revocation system,to provide legal basis and institutional support for the development of the civil self-admission system.In terms of justice,this paper proposes to refine the applicable rules for fictional self-admission and establish a false self-admission identification and regulation mechanism.In terms of supporting systems,the article proposes to improve the court’s right of interpretation system,establish a compulsory defense system,and clearly regulate the evidence exchange procedure.These measures will help to further improve the feasibility of the civil self-admission system and promote the maturity of China’s self-admission system. |