| With the development of modern science and technology,the number of difficult and specialized problems encountered in cases has gradually increased,and the requirements for evidence have also increased significantly,and the system of criminal expert assistants has emerged as the times require.The original intention of this system is to assist parties or judges in distinguishing case evidence and understanding professional issues from a more professional perspective.However,the criminal expert assistant system is still immature in our country,and there are still many problems to be solved in the application process.Under this background,the perfection of the criminal expert assistant system has become a problem worthy of study.This article starts from the macro level of legislation,on the basis of proving the meaning and characteristics of criminal expert assistants,with the help of a detailed review of the current legislation,the lack of legislation in this system is analyzed,mainly including vague access qualifications,single rights and obligations,unclear validity of expert assistants’ opinions,and related supporting facilities.The measures are missing four aspects.Afterwards,by examining the representative systems set up by foreign countries such as the United States,Italy,and Russia,on the basis of comparative analysis,it summarizes the mature experience that can be absorbed by our country’s legislation.Finally,based on the above analysis,from the various academic viewpoints and various practical practices,in view of the deficiencies in the legislation,a path that highlights our country’s characteristics and can provide theoretical guidance for judicial practice is further explored. |
