| With the corresponding introduction of China’s criminal law amendment,the threshold of incrimination has been reduced,and the crime of dangerous driving has become the king of crimes in China.Besides,the reform of the staffing system has not alleviated the number of cases,but intensified the contradiction between judicial resources and the surge of cases.In order to pursue the efficiency of cases and implement the criminal policy of balancing justice with mercy,China began to pilot the leniency system of guilty plea in 2016.In 2018,the system was written into the Criminal Procedure Law,formally establishing the system in China.However,the system has faced many problems since its development,such as insufficient positioning and matching of on-duty lawyers,the implicit reduction of the standard of proof,and the lack of sufficient protection of the voluntary nature of criminal suspects’ admission of guilt.Some scholars have proposed to establish evidence discovery system in the case of guilty plea.In 2019,article 29 of the guidelines for guilty admission and punishment issued by the Two ministries of High School and High School stipulates that "People’s procuratorates can,according to the specific circumstances of cases,explore the evidence discovery system to ensure the right to know and the authenticity and volunariness of guilty admission and punishment of criminal suspects." Since the criminal Procedure law established the defender’s comprehensive review right in the review and prosecution stage,the discussion on this system has disappeared in Our country.Now the implementation of the leniency system of guilty plea makes the lackluster evidence discovery system new vitality.Based on the practice,the author will discuss how to construct the evidence discovery system in accordance with the actual situation of China’s judicial system,centering on the subject,procedure,scope and responsibility of the evidence discovery system in guilty admission and punishment cases. |