| In the current judicial practice,the litigation cases of paid entrustment occur frequently.On the one hand,influenced by the traditional concept of human feelings since ancient times,there are a large number of entrustment phenomena.On the other hand,when the act of asking for entrustment does not constitute or is not suspected of criminal accountability,there are some disputes about the nature of the paid act of asking for entrustment and the legal treatment of the relevant property.This means that such problems still have large research space and research value.This paper is a research on the nature identification of paid entrustment in the field of civil law.Because the nature identification of paid entrustment is different,there are often great differences in the treatment results of entrusted property.Therefore,this paper aims to try to carry out reflective research from two perspectives.On the one hand,how to curb and guide the entrusted behavior through the judicial judgment of the ownership of the entrusted property.On the other hand,for similar cases,how to unify the judgment rules and pursue the judicial effect of "same case and same judgment". |