The Research On Specific Administrative Action In The Public Security Management Punishment

Public security management behavior is a public management activity carried out by public security organs in accordance with laws and regulations for the purpose of curbing illegal acts,protecting citizens’ legitimate rights and interests and maintaining social stability.It is an important part of national administration.It plays an important role in social life and is easy to become the focus of social attention.Among them,public security management punishment,as one of the important conclusions of public security management behavior,not only represents the administrative ability and law enforcement level of public security organs,reflects the law enforcement authority of public security organs,but also is closely related to the rights and interests of citizens,especially the administrative counterpart.This paper is problem oriented,uses literature research and case study methods,takes the service-oriented government theory and procedural justice theory as the support,takes the administrative reconsideration cases involving public security management punishment in X district from2019 to 2021 as the research object,analyzes the problems existing in specific administrative acts in public security management punishment,deeply analyzes the causes of the problems,and puts forward practical countermeasures and suggestions on this basis,Improve the rationality,compliance and legitimacy of public security management punishment decisions,and reduce citizens,especially administrative counterparts’ doubts about public security management punishment decisions,so as to achieve the public security organs’ administration according to law and promote the establishment of a service-oriented government.Through research and analysis,it is found that the specific administrative acts in the public security management punishment are prone to the following problems,resulting in the violation of the specific administrative acts: first,they do not perform the legal duties of public security management,such as failing to deal with the case in time after receiving the report,failing to perform the written notification procedure,etc;Second,violating the legal procedures,including making punishment decisions beyond the legal time limit,missing or failing to perform the legal procedures;Third,the concrete behavior is obviously improper;Fourth,the fact that the facts are not clear and the evidence is insufficient,which can be divided into two types: the fact that the facts are wrong and the fact that the facts are not clear;Fifth,the applicable legal basis is wrong.In view of the above problems,this paper analyzes the deep-seated reasons for the anomie of specific administrative acts from four perspectives:the imbalance of interests among various subjects,the lack of rights of administrative counterparts,the inadequacy of supervision and accountability mechanisms,and the need to improve the legal environment,and puts forward targeted suggestions: first,strengthen the self-construction of administrative subjects;The second is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart;Third,improve the supervision and accountability mechanism;Fourth,unblock the way of relief;Fifthly,the governance exploration to create a good law enforcement environment.